Historical change of scientific paradigms and the composition of the offence

Relevance . In the last decade, the focus of scientific research has shifted from specific issues to fundamental and interdisciplinary ones. For this reason, scholars in criminal law increasingly turn to fundamental categories, traditionally including crime and the elements of a crime. Modern discussions on the elements of a crime (its essence, structure, characteristics, etc.) necessitate a return to the origins of this category's formation and an analysis of the determinants that influenced changes in its content. The purpose of this study is to justify the dependence of the content of the fundamental category of "elements of a crime" on the scientific paradigm. Objectives : To analyze and compare the historical shifts in scientific paradigms and the modifications of the category of "elements of a crime" in criminal law science; to identify the specific features of understanding the elements of a crime in a given historical period. Methodology . The study is based on the historical method, which made it possible to establish a connection between the prevailing scientific paradigm at a certain stage in the development of criminal law science and the understanding of the elements of a crime. Additionally, other general scientific methods were used, including analysis, synthesis, induction, and deduction. Results . The study has proven that with the development of the theory of knowledge, specifically with changes in modes of thinking, the concept of the elements of a crime has also evolved. Conclusion . The historical changes in types of thinking (the prevailing philosophical method of cognition) initially led to the transfer of the elements of a crime from the procedural to the substantive domain. Later, it facilitated the integration of subjective and objective aspects within it and ultimately transitioned from a set of subjective and objective characteristics of a real phenomenon to an informational model that describes a complexly structured crime.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Proceedings of the Southwest State University Series History and Law
Published
2025-02-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.21869/2223-1501-2025-15-1-112-121
Primary Topic
History of Science and Medicine
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Historical change of scientific paradigms and the composition of the offence

Е. А. Соловьева
Proceedings of the Southwest State University Series History and Law
History of Science and Medicine
article

Historical change of scientific paradigms and the composition of the offence

Е. А. Соловьева
article en

Abstract

Relevance . In the last decade, the focus of scientific research has shifted from specific issues to fundamental and interdisciplinary ones. For this reason, scholars in criminal law increasingly turn to fundamental categories, traditionally including crime and the elements of a crime. Modern discussions on the elements of a crime (its essence, structure, characteristics, etc.) necessitate a return to the origins of this category's formation and an analysis of the determinants that influenced changes in its content. The purpose of this study is to justify the dependence of the content of the fundamental category of "elements of a crime" on the scientific paradigm. Objectives : To analyze and compare the historical shifts in scientific paradigms and the modifications of the category of "elements of a crime" in criminal law science; to identify the specific features of understanding the elements of a crime in a given historical period. Methodology . The study is based on the historical method, which made it possible to establish a connection between the prevailing scientific paradigm at a certain stage in the development of criminal law science and the understanding of the elements of a crime. Additionally, other general scientific methods were used, including analysis, synthesis, induction, and deduction. Results . The study has proven that with the development of the theory of knowledge, specifically with changes in modes of thinking, the concept of the elements of a crime has also evolved. Conclusion . The historical changes in types of thinking (the prevailing philosophical method of cognition) initially led to the transfer of the elements of a crime from the procedural to the substantive domain. Later, it facilitated the integration of subjective and objective aspects within it and ultimately transitioned from a set of subjective and objective characteristics of a real phenomenon to an informational model that describes a complexly structured crime.

Proceedings of the Southwest State University Series History and LawVol. 15(1)
Moscow Power Engineering Institute (RU), Solikamsk State Pedagogical Institute (RU)
Openalex Percentile: Top 94%
History of Science and Medicine
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.