Individual Human Rights and National Interests – Finding the Balance: the Case of India and Russia

Summary This paper advances the individual human rights perspective to the understanding of national security by viewing it from a comparative lens concerning India and Russia. The question that is explored is how to safeguard individual human rights and human security at the larger level from the unwarranted restrictions imposed under the garb of national security. Although in countries like India, the judiciary is supposed to hold governments to the high constitutional principles that might be violated in the name of unwarranted security threats. On the other hand, in countries like Russia, a tyrannical leader, that keeps firm hands-on power for decades, can ignore the courts and other institutions, dismiss the check-and-balances, and produce massive human rights violations. In this light, this article attempts to provide solutions to these comparative situations by securing the right of defense, redefining extraordinary powers with the state, and restricting the power of law enforcement agencies.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Mezinárodní a srovnávací právní revue/International and Comparative Law Review
Published
2024-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.2478/iclr-2024-0023
Citations
1
Primary Topic
South Asian Studies and Conflicts
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.23
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Individual Human Rights and National Interests – Finding the Balance: the Case of India and Russia

Vesselin Popovski, Abhinav Mehrotra
1 citations
Mezinárodní a srovnávací právní revue/International and Comparative Law Review
South Asian Studies and Conflicts
2.23
article

Individual Human Rights and National Interests – Finding the Balance: the Case of India and Russia

Vesselin Popovski, Abhinav Mehrotra
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Summary This paper advances the individual human rights perspective to the understanding of national security by viewing it from a comparative lens concerning India and Russia. The question that is explored is how to safeguard individual human rights and human security at the larger level from the unwarranted restrictions imposed under the garb of national security. Although in countries like India, the judiciary is supposed to hold governments to the high constitutional principles that might be violated in the name of unwarranted security threats. On the other hand, in countries like Russia, a tyrannical leader, that keeps firm hands-on power for decades, can ignore the courts and other institutions, dismiss the check-and-balances, and produce massive human rights violations. In this light, this article attempts to provide solutions to these comparative situations by securing the right of defense, redefining extraordinary powers with the state, and restricting the power of law enforcement agencies.

Mezinárodní a srovnávací právní revue/International and Comparative Law ReviewVol. 24(2)
O. P. Jindal Global University (IN), Sofia University "St. Kliment Ohridski" (BG)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
South Asian Studies and Conflicts
2.23
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Individual Human Rights and National Interests – Finding the Balance: the Case of India and Russia — Vesselin Popovski, Abhinav Mehrotra · Mezinárodní a srovnávací právní revue/International and Comparative Law Review (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS