Russian aggression against Ukraine and the law of countermeasures – a momentum for caution or an opportunity for evolution?

Summary The paper addresses some of the challenging legal issues invoked by the response of the part of the international community to the Russian aggression in Ukraine in 2022. These legal issues were selected through the lenses of evolution versus caution paradigm. In particular, it maps the issue of the permissibility of third--party countermeasures, a topic that has already enjoyed attention of the doctrine but is still controversial. It then focuses on the issue of confiscation of frozen Russian assets as a possible form of countermeasure. This issue is addressed through the optics of the human right to private property and briefly also through the lenses of the law on the immunities of States. The paper then addresses a complicated issue of possible claims against sanctions initiated in international investment arbitration. It focuses primarily on the question whether host States can raise the defence of countermeasures in investment arbitration.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Mezinárodní a srovnávací právní revue/International and Comparative Law Review
Published
2024-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.2478/iclr-2024-0021
Primary Topic
European and Russian Geopolitical Military Strategies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Russian aggression against Ukraine and the law of countermeasures – a momentum for caution or an opportunity for evolution?

Petr Stejskal
Mezinárodní a srovnávací právní revue/International and Comparative Law Review
European and Russian Geopolitical Military Strategies
article

Russian aggression against Ukraine and the law of countermeasures – a momentum for caution or an opportunity for evolution?

Petr Stejskal
article en

Abstract

Summary The paper addresses some of the challenging legal issues invoked by the response of the part of the international community to the Russian aggression in Ukraine in 2022. These legal issues were selected through the lenses of evolution versus caution paradigm. In particular, it maps the issue of the permissibility of third--party countermeasures, a topic that has already enjoyed attention of the doctrine but is still controversial. It then focuses on the issue of confiscation of frozen Russian assets as a possible form of countermeasure. This issue is addressed through the optics of the human right to private property and briefly also through the lenses of the law on the immunities of States. The paper then addresses a complicated issue of possible claims against sanctions initiated in international investment arbitration. It focuses primarily on the question whether host States can raise the defence of countermeasures in investment arbitration.

Mezinárodní a srovnávací právní revue/International and Comparative Law ReviewVol. 24(2)
Palacký University Olomouc (CZ)
Openalex Percentile: Top 54%
European and Russian Geopolitical Military Strategies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.