Looting Made Legal

In this article, I explore a heritage scandal known as the “sacking of the Frissell,” which occurred in the Indigenous Zapotec town of Mitla in Oaxaca, Mexico. One evening in 2006, it is said, the Frissell Museum’s entire collection of artifacts disappeared. Mitleños were shocked and appalled when it was revealed that the “theft” had been carried out by Mexico’s Instituto Nacional de Antropología e Historia (INAH), which claimed rights to the collection as national (Mexican rather than Zapotec or Mitleño) patrimony. This article traces the different understandings of (dis)possession and heritage that circulated around this incident, arguing that INAH’s reported actions reflect a distinctly settler-colonial modality through which Indigenous rights to their own past are erased and silenced. In doing so, it suggests that “looting made legal” not only upholds a nationalist ideology but also creates the conditions for haunting. This article thus engages with and contributes to anthropological literature from critical heritage and settler-colonial studies, as well as ethnographic studies of southern Mexico.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Current Anthropology
Published
2025-03-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1086/734712
Primary Topic
Law in Society and Culture
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Looting Made Legal

Hilary Morgan V. Leathem
Current Anthropology
Law in Society and Culture
article

Looting Made Legal

Hilary Morgan V. Leathem
article en

Abstract

In this article, I explore a heritage scandal known as the “sacking of the Frissell,” which occurred in the Indigenous Zapotec town of Mitla in Oaxaca, Mexico. One evening in 2006, it is said, the Frissell Museum’s entire collection of artifacts disappeared. Mitleños were shocked and appalled when it was revealed that the “theft” had been carried out by Mexico’s Instituto Nacional de Antropología e Historia (INAH), which claimed rights to the collection as national (Mexican rather than Zapotec or Mitleño) patrimony. This article traces the different understandings of (dis)possession and heritage that circulated around this incident, arguing that INAH’s reported actions reflect a distinctly settler-colonial modality through which Indigenous rights to their own past are erased and silenced. In doing so, it suggests that “looting made legal” not only upholds a nationalist ideology but also creates the conditions for haunting. This article thus engages with and contributes to anthropological literature from critical heritage and settler-colonial studies, as well as ethnographic studies of southern Mexico.

Current AnthropologyVol. 66(2)
Openalex Percentile: Top 94%
Law in Society and Culture
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.