More persistent precipitation regimes induce soil degradation

• Climate change towards longer dry and wet periods negatively impacts soil. • Aggregate stability, water retention and infiltration declined. • Bulk density increased and soil water repellency was modified. • The induced soil degradation may reduce soils’ resilience to future stressors. In the mid-latitudes, precipitation regimes are becoming more persistent, with longer consistently dry and rainy periods. Such a rise in precipitation regime persistence (PRP) – defined as the length of consecutive dry or wet periods – could significantly affect soil properties and their role in soil–plant-water relationships. To investigate these effects, we conducted a 16-month outdoor grassland mesocosm experiment. We simulated four levels of PRP by varying the duration of alternating dry and rainy periods: 1, 6, 15, or 60 days. The regimes started with either a dry or a wet period, resulting in two levels of timing and eight different treatments altogether, all of which received the same total amount of water across the entire experiment. Higher PRP (longer alternation periods) decreased soil aggregate stability, without a similar trend in total soil carbon. PRP also affected potential soil water repellency (SWR) in interaction with timing. Higher PRP decreased potential SWR when the timing of the dry periods coincided with summer heatwaves and plant productivity was overall hindered. However, when the dry periods coincided with less warm months and the overall plant productivity was maintained, PRP increased potential SWR. PRP enhanced actual soil water repellency measured in the field which reduced infiltration rates. Water retention was also affected, with lower field capacity and available water capacity in the more persistent treatments, and wilting point following a convex relationship across the PRP range. Furthermore, bulk density increased with PRP. Structural equation modeling revealed that these soil degradation patterns often but not always correspond with plant productivity, which in general declined with PRP. However, some soil properties proved to be more sensitive to PRP than plant productivity. Overall, more persistent precipitation regimes induced soil degradation especially by reducing aggregate stability, water retention, and infiltration, and this soil legacy may exacerbate the effects of future climate change on temperate grasslands.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Geoderma
Published
2025-03-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2025.117230
Primary Topic
Soil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

More persistent precipitation regimes induce soil degradation

Han Asard, Simon Reynaert, Miguel Portillo‐Estrada, Karen Vancampenhout et al.
Geoderma
Soil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics
article

More persistent precipitation regimes induce soil degradation

Han Asard, Simon Reynaert, Miguel Portillo‐Estrada, Karen Vancampenhout, Hans J. De Boeck, Gaby Deckmyn, Ivan Nijs, Olga Vindušková, Steffen Schlüter, Gerrit T.S. Beemster, Erik Verbruggen, Jan Frouz
article en

Abstract

• Climate change towards longer dry and wet periods negatively impacts soil. • Aggregate stability, water retention and infiltration declined. • Bulk density increased and soil water repellency was modified. • The induced soil degradation may reduce soils’ resilience to future stressors. In the mid-latitudes, precipitation regimes are becoming more persistent, with longer consistently dry and rainy periods. Such a rise in precipitation regime persistence (PRP) – defined as the length of consecutive dry or wet periods – could significantly affect soil properties and their role in soil–plant-water relationships. To investigate these effects, we conducted a 16-month outdoor grassland mesocosm experiment. We simulated four levels of PRP by varying the duration of alternating dry and rainy periods: 1, 6, 15, or 60 days. The regimes started with either a dry or a wet period, resulting in two levels of timing and eight different treatments altogether, all of which received the same total amount of water across the entire experiment. Higher PRP (longer alternation periods) decreased soil aggregate stability, without a similar trend in total soil carbon. PRP also affected potential soil water repellency (SWR) in interaction with timing. Higher PRP decreased potential SWR when the timing of the dry periods coincided with summer heatwaves and plant productivity was overall hindered. However, when the dry periods coincided with less warm months and the overall plant productivity was maintained, PRP increased potential SWR. PRP enhanced actual soil water repellency measured in the field which reduced infiltration rates. Water retention was also affected, with lower field capacity and available water capacity in the more persistent treatments, and wilting point following a convex relationship across the PRP range. Furthermore, bulk density increased with PRP. Structural equation modeling revealed that these soil degradation patterns often but not always correspond with plant productivity, which in general declined with PRP. However, some soil properties proved to be more sensitive to PRP than plant productivity. Overall, more persistent precipitation regimes induced soil degradation especially by reducing aggregate stability, water retention, and infiltration, and this soil legacy may exacerbate the effects of future climate change on temperate grasslands.

GeodermaVol. 455
Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research (DE), University of Antwerp (BE), Charles University (CZ), Institute of Soil Biology (CZ), Geographic Information Management (Belgium) (BE)
Univerzita Karlova v Praze, Fonds Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek, Universiteit Antwerpen, Vlaamse regering
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 96%
Soil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.