Reinforcement learning for control and optimization of real buildings: Identifying and addressing implementation hurdles

As part of the broader digitalization of society, artificial intelligence is one promising way to improve and enhance energy use in buildings. Traditionally, the building service systems have been managed with manually tuned rule-based controllers. While they are cost-efficient and simple, they might suffer from suboptimality and lack of adaptivity to the changes in the surrounding environment. Reinforcement learning (RL) is a machine learning type well-suited for control and optimization tasks. In RL, optimal control is approached through trial and error, with the goal of maximizing cumulative rewards. In simulation studies, it has shown great potential for the control and optimization of building applications. While a lot of research has been conducted in this area, real-world implementations are harder to find. After concluding that AI-based market solutions exist, this review summarizes how thoroughly these applications have been tested on practical deployments and how these studies have addressed securing safety of the adaptive solutions and possibility to utilize the solutions on a wider scale. Digital twin solutions could enable pretraining and online deployment. Additionally, the paper evaluates how the ethical aspects are addressed in these implementations and concludes that the RL-control systems lack a systematic ethical analysis. Lack of long-term studies and the focus only on just heating or cooling instead of more holistic view considering the entire building management system leaves significant gaps in understanding the reliability and effectiveness of the proposed RL solutions in complex real-world settings. • Review of reinforcement learning control studies in real building deployments. • Reliability and scalability issues are still on the way to wider utilization. • Ethical aspects should be considered and reported systematically.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Building Engineering
Published
2025-03-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2025.112283
Citations
6
Primary Topic
Building Energy and Comfort Optimization
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
6.04

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Reinforcement learning for control and optimization of real buildings: Identifying and addressing implementation hurdles

Nina Wessberg, Lotta Kannari, Julia Kantorovitch, Satu Paiho et al.
6 citations
Journal of Building Engineering
Building Energy and Comfort Optimization
6.04
article

Reinforcement learning for control and optimization of real buildings: Identifying and addressing implementation hurdles

Nina Wessberg, Lotta Kannari, Julia Kantorovitch, Satu Paiho, Sara Hirvonen
article en
6 citations

Abstract

As part of the broader digitalization of society, artificial intelligence is one promising way to improve and enhance energy use in buildings. Traditionally, the building service systems have been managed with manually tuned rule-based controllers. While they are cost-efficient and simple, they might suffer from suboptimality and lack of adaptivity to the changes in the surrounding environment. Reinforcement learning (RL) is a machine learning type well-suited for control and optimization tasks. In RL, optimal control is approached through trial and error, with the goal of maximizing cumulative rewards. In simulation studies, it has shown great potential for the control and optimization of building applications. While a lot of research has been conducted in this area, real-world implementations are harder to find. After concluding that AI-based market solutions exist, this review summarizes how thoroughly these applications have been tested on practical deployments and how these studies have addressed securing safety of the adaptive solutions and possibility to utilize the solutions on a wider scale. Digital twin solutions could enable pretraining and online deployment. Additionally, the paper evaluates how the ethical aspects are addressed in these implementations and concludes that the RL-control systems lack a systematic ethical analysis. Lack of long-term studies and the focus only on just heating or cooling instead of more holistic view considering the entire building management system leaves significant gaps in understanding the reliability and effectiveness of the proposed RL solutions in complex real-world settings. • Review of reinforcement learning control studies in real building deployments. • Reliability and scalability issues are still on the way to wider utilization. • Ethical aspects should be considered and reported systematically.

Journal of Building EngineeringVol. 104
VTT Technical Research Centre of Finland (FI)
European Commission, Academy of Finland, Horizon 2020 Framework Programme
Sustainable cities and communities
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Building Energy and Comfort Optimization
6.04
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.