Consenting for themselves: a qualitative study exploring a Gillick Competence assessment to enable adolescents to self-consent to low-risk online research

The MCQs were acceptable to both young people and parents, providing preliminary evidence for the potential of this process for allowing <16s to self-consent to online, anonymous, low-risk mental health research. Further research is needed to validate the effectiveness of this process among a diverse range of populations and research contexts.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
BMJ Open
Published
2025-03-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2024-090747
Citations
4
Primary Topic
Ethics in Clinical Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
7.51

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Consenting for themselves: a qualitative study exploring a Gillick Competence assessment to enable adolescents to self-consent to low-risk online research

Lara Willis, Maria Elizabeth Loades, Ching-Wen Chiu, Grace Perry et al.
4 citations
BMJ Open
Ethics in Clinical Research
7.51
article

Consenting for themselves: a qualitative study exploring a Gillick Competence assessment to enable adolescents to self-consent to low-risk online research

Lara Willis, Maria Elizabeth Loades, Ching-Wen Chiu, Grace Perry, Emma E. Wilson, Nina Higson‐Sweeney, Melanie Luximon
article en
4 citations

Abstract

The MCQs were acceptable to both young people and parents, providing preliminary evidence for the potential of this process for allowing <16s to self-consent to online, anonymous, low-risk mental health research. Further research is needed to validate the effectiveness of this process among a diverse range of populations and research contexts.

BMJ OpenVol. 15(3)
University of Bath (GB)
Research Trainees Coordinating Centre
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Ethics in Clinical Research
7.51
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.