A validation study of the Martin and Pratt nonword reading test

The Martin and Pratt Nonword Reading Test (‘Martin & Pratt’) is an Australian-normed assessment of nonword reading accuracy. The current study was conducted to examine whether this test still validly and accurately estimates the decoding skills of primary school-aged children, despite its norms having been collected in 1996. To address these questions, reading assessment data were collected from 176 Australian students (3 independent schools) from Years 1 through 6. Strong correlations between the Martin & Pratt and similar measures were observed, although the standard scores generated were consistently higher than other tests. This pattern of results indicated that the test is valid but overestimates nonword reading ability.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Australian Journal of Education
Published
2025-03-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/00049441241310642
Primary Topic
Reading and Literacy Development
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A validation study of the Martin and Pratt nonword reading test

Kevin Wheldall, Nicola Bell
Australian Journal of Education
Reading and Literacy Development
article

A validation study of the Martin and Pratt nonword reading test

Kevin Wheldall, Nicola Bell
article en

Abstract

The Martin and Pratt Nonword Reading Test (‘Martin & Pratt’) is an Australian-normed assessment of nonword reading accuracy. The current study was conducted to examine whether this test still validly and accurately estimates the decoding skills of primary school-aged children, despite its norms having been collected in 1996. To address these questions, reading assessment data were collected from 176 Australian students (3 independent schools) from Years 1 through 6. Strong correlations between the Martin & Pratt and similar measures were observed, although the standard scores generated were consistently higher than other tests. This pattern of results indicated that the test is valid but overestimates nonword reading ability.

Australian Journal of EducationVol. 69(1)
Macquarie University (AU)
Openalex Percentile: Top 96%
Reading and Literacy Development
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.