Fair Learning by Model Averaging

The central question of this paper is how to simply enhance a set of given supervised learning algorithms under some fairness requirements, to ensure that any sensitive variable does not “unfairly” influence the outcome. To achieve this goal, we work with several notions of fairness (Demographic Parity, Equalized Odds, Lack of Disparate Mistreatment), possibly generalised to more general concepts of conditional fairness. We linearly combine an ensemble of binary and/or continuous basis classifiers or regressors to build an “approximately optimal” solution in terms of fairness and accuracy for any given notion of fairness. The trade-off between fairness and predictive power is managed by considering penalised criteria. We rely on post-processing procedures without any transformation of the data nor of the basis training algorithms. Some empirical experiments, by simulation and on real databases, are provided to illustrate our approach.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Risk and Decision Analysis
Published
2025-03-02
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/15697371251321734
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.37
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Fair Learning by Model Averaging

Jean‐David Fermanian, Xuwen Liu, Dominique Guégan
1 citations
Risk and Decision Analysis
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
2.37
article

Fair Learning by Model Averaging

Jean‐David Fermanian, Xuwen Liu, Dominique Guégan
article en
1 citations

Abstract

The central question of this paper is how to simply enhance a set of given supervised learning algorithms under some fairness requirements, to ensure that any sensitive variable does not “unfairly” influence the outcome. To achieve this goal, we work with several notions of fairness (Demographic Parity, Equalized Odds, Lack of Disparate Mistreatment), possibly generalised to more general concepts of conditional fairness. We linearly combine an ensemble of binary and/or continuous basis classifiers or regressors to build an “approximately optimal” solution in terms of fairness and accuracy for any given notion of fairness. The trade-off between fairness and predictive power is managed by considering penalised criteria. We rely on post-processing procedures without any transformation of the data nor of the basis training algorithms. Some empirical experiments, by simulation and on real databases, are provided to illustrate our approach.

Risk and Decision AnalysisVol. 11(1-2)
JPMorgan Chase & Co (United States) (US), Université Paris 1 Panthéon-Sorbonne (FR), ENSAE Paris (FR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 14%
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
2.37
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.