Comparative surgical invasiveness of internal fixation for pathological fractures in metastatic bone disease versus traumatic fractures: a quantitative analysis of operative time and blood loss
Surgeries for metastatic fractures are more invasive than those for traumatic fractures because of compromised bone integrity and procedural complexity. Operative time is a key indicator of surgical invasiveness, highlighting the need for tailored surgical approaches to manage metastatic bone disease effectively.
Authors
- Eisuke Kobayashi (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5751-473X)
- Tomoki Nakamura (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1099-7436)
- Shusa Ohshika
- Eiji Nakata (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5971-4142)
- Keisuke Horiuchi (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7063-9609)
- Yoshihiro Nishida (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7511-6388)
- Hiroyuki Kawashima (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9511-9773)
- Katsuhiro Hayashi (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8665-2154)
- Makoto Endo (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7956-2190)
- Satoshi Takenaka (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4796-5817)
- Tetsuya Hamada
- Takeshi Morii
Institutions
- Kanazawa University (JP)
- Kurume University (JP)
- Kyushu University (JP)
- Hirosaki University (JP)
- Okayama University (JP)
- Mie University (JP)
- Kyorin University (JP)
- National Cancer Center (US)
- Nagoya University Hospital (JP)
- Osaka International Cancer Institute (JP)
- Niigata University Medical and Dental Hospital (JP)
- Osaka International Cancer Institute (JP)
- National Defense Medical College (JP)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Japanese Journal of Clinical Oncology
- Published
- 2025-02-26
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1093/jjco/hyaf039
- Citations
- 2
- Primary Topic
- Management of metastatic bone disease
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 4.01