Creep in steel-concrete composite beams bonded by adhesive and connected by studs

This study investigates the creep behavior of steel-concrete composite beams, comparing traditional shear stud connections with adhesive bonding. Unlike shear studs, adhesive bonding distributes stress more evenly along the interface, reducing stress concentrations and enhancing structural performance. It also eliminates the need for welding or bolting, significantly reducing construction time—an advantage particularly beneficial for prefabricated and modular structures. Flexural creep tests were conducted under constant loads for 120 days, with longitudinal deformations monitored. Three-dimensional finite element models incorporating linear viscoelastic theory were developed to analyze strain and stress evolution. Results highlight significant differences: adhesive-bonded beams exhibit lower creep strains and more uniform strain distribution compared to stud-connected beams. Creep strain follows a three-stage pattern: in the initial stage (0–9 days), adhesive bonding reduces the rate of creep increase by up to 39 %; in the second stage (10–80 days), by up to 33 %; and in the final stage, the creep stabilizes, with an overall reduction of up to 24 %. Finite element simulations further demonstrate that adhesive bonding enhances stress redistribution and ensures a more uniform creep variation along the beam’s length, offering a promising alternative for long-term structural performance. • Experimental study on creep behavior of steel-concrete composite beams. • Development of finite element models for both concrete and adhesive materials. • Creep variation of composite beams connected by shear studs and adhesive. • Investigation of interface strain redistribution mechanisms during creep deformation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Structures
Published
2025-03-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.istruc.2025.108560
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Structural Load-Bearing Analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.91
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Creep in steel-concrete composite beams bonded by adhesive and connected by studs

Alex Li, Boussad Abbès, Ismail Yurtdas
2 citations
Structures
Structural Load-Bearing Analysis
1.91
article

Creep in steel-concrete composite beams bonded by adhesive and connected by studs

Alex Li, Boussad Abbès, Ismail Yurtdas
article en
2 citations

Abstract

This study investigates the creep behavior of steel-concrete composite beams, comparing traditional shear stud connections with adhesive bonding. Unlike shear studs, adhesive bonding distributes stress more evenly along the interface, reducing stress concentrations and enhancing structural performance. It also eliminates the need for welding or bolting, significantly reducing construction time—an advantage particularly beneficial for prefabricated and modular structures. Flexural creep tests were conducted under constant loads for 120 days, with longitudinal deformations monitored. Three-dimensional finite element models incorporating linear viscoelastic theory were developed to analyze strain and stress evolution. Results highlight significant differences: adhesive-bonded beams exhibit lower creep strains and more uniform strain distribution compared to stud-connected beams. Creep strain follows a three-stage pattern: in the initial stage (0–9 days), adhesive bonding reduces the rate of creep increase by up to 39 %; in the second stage (10–80 days), by up to 33 %; and in the final stage, the creep stabilizes, with an overall reduction of up to 24 %. Finite element simulations further demonstrate that adhesive bonding enhances stress redistribution and ensures a more uniform creep variation along the beam’s length, offering a promising alternative for long-term structural performance. • Experimental study on creep behavior of steel-concrete composite beams. • Development of finite element models for both concrete and adhesive materials. • Creep variation of composite beams connected by shear studs and adhesive. • Investigation of interface strain redistribution mechanisms during creep deformation.

StructuresVol. 74
Université de Reims Champagne-Ardenne (FR)
Sustainable cities and communities
Openalex Percentile: Top 17%
Structural Load-Bearing Analysis
1.91
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.