High-Risk Patient Refusals in the Prehospital Setting—Clinical and Legal Considerations

When emergency medical service (EMS) arrives on the scene, it is estimated that patients end up declining treatment and/or transport around 5% to 10% of the time. When a patient is suspected of having a life-threatening emergency and declines care, these cases are deemed "high-risk refusals," as the subsequent delay in treatment drastically increases the risk of morbidity and mortality, as well as the legal risk for all those involved. These cases warrant careful consideration and deliberate training, not only among EMS professionals and EMS medical directors but also among any in-hospital physicians providing online medical oversight. To mitigate the risk associated with high-risk refusals, EMS systems and emergency departments should have standardized policies and guidelines in place for managing these cases, just as with any other complex, high-risk procedure. State statutes should be referenced and ideally legal counsel should be consulted when developing these guidelines. Checklists and quick references are recommended, and calling online medical supervision should be strongly encouraged. EMS medical directors should also routinely review high-risk refusal charts and include these cases in their ongoing quality improvement and quality assessment efforts.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of the American College of Emergency Physicians Open
Published
2025-03-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acepjo.2025.100083
Primary Topic
Healthcare Decision-Making and Restraints
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

High-Risk Patient Refusals in the Prehospital Setting—Clinical and Legal Considerations

Michael O’Brien, Bryan McNeilly, Michael B. Weinstock, Mat Goebel et al.
Journal of the American College of Emergency Physicians Open
Healthcare Decision-Making and Restraints
article

High-Risk Patient Refusals in the Prehospital Setting—Clinical and Legal Considerations

Michael O’Brien, Bryan McNeilly, Michael B. Weinstock, Mat Goebel, W. Ann Maggiore, Nicholas Cozzi, Navin Ariyaprakai, Thomas Lardaro
article en

Abstract

When emergency medical service (EMS) arrives on the scene, it is estimated that patients end up declining treatment and/or transport around 5% to 10% of the time. When a patient is suspected of having a life-threatening emergency and declines care, these cases are deemed "high-risk refusals," as the subsequent delay in treatment drastically increases the risk of morbidity and mortality, as well as the legal risk for all those involved. These cases warrant careful consideration and deliberate training, not only among EMS professionals and EMS medical directors but also among any in-hospital physicians providing online medical oversight. To mitigate the risk associated with high-risk refusals, EMS systems and emergency departments should have standardized policies and guidelines in place for managing these cases, just as with any other complex, high-risk procedure. State statutes should be referenced and ideally legal counsel should be consulted when developing these guidelines. Checklists and quick references are recommended, and calling online medical supervision should be strongly encouraged. EMS medical directors should also routinely review high-risk refusal charts and include these cases in their ongoing quality improvement and quality assessment efforts.

Journal of the American College of Emergency Physicians OpenVol. 6(2)
Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey (US), Rush University Medical Center (US), Trinity Health (US), University of New Mexico (US), University of Washington (US), The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center (US), Yale University (US), Mercy Medical Center (US), University at Buffalo, State University of New York (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 94%
Healthcare Decision-Making and Restraints
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.