Benchmarking of Governance Models for Basic Health Coverage: Research of Good Practices for Morocco

Background: The benchmarking is a concept with multiple aims. The reflection on improving the governance of Basic Health Coverage (BHC) in Morocco leads us to analyze successful solutions that have been implemented in other countries. Objectives: This study aimed to make an international benchmark of BHC’s governance models and look for good practices in other countries in order to study the possibility of their implementation at the Moroccan level. Methods: We benchmarked BHC's governance models by determining the criteria for selecting the benchmark countries. We have selected five countries, namely: Turkey, Malaysia, France, Chile, Rwanda. We analyzed governance models based on the five dimensions of the World Bank study "Governing Mandatory Health Insurance: Learning from Experience", which are: Coherence of the decision-making structure, stakeholder involvement, transparency and access to information, supervision and regulation, coherence and stability. Results: Our analysis based on the five dimensions showed that there are relative common factors with the governance model between the benchmark countries that allowed them to achieve universal health coverage, however, each country has introduced innovative rules and solutions adapted to its context and constraints. There are several good governance practices that we have drawn from this benchmark. Morocco can use these good practices to improve its governance model for BHC. An adaptation effort is necessary, taking into consideration the existing situation. Discussion: There is not a governance model suitable for all countries. Each country is trying to find a formula that will allow it to overcome its challenges. Morocco can draw inspiration from these models to instaure good practices to adopt, but this cannot happen without repositioning the governance of health coverage in the government's strategic vision in relation to the social protection agenda and the objectives of the health system. Conclusion: Improved governance has a direct impact on the performance of the basic health coverage system. In this sense, Morocco must take this aspect into consideration in the process of achieving universal health coverage as many other countries that have made this great step forward.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Medical and Surgical Research
Published
2024-12-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.46327/msrjg.1.000000000000262
Primary Topic
Healthcare Systems and Reforms
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Benchmarking of Governance Models for Basic Health Coverage: Research of Good Practices for Morocco

Rédouane Abouqal, Mohammed Karsi
Journal of Medical and Surgical Research
Healthcare Systems and Reforms
article

Benchmarking of Governance Models for Basic Health Coverage: Research of Good Practices for Morocco

Rédouane Abouqal, Mohammed Karsi
article en

Abstract

Background: The benchmarking is a concept with multiple aims. The reflection on improving the governance of Basic Health Coverage (BHC) in Morocco leads us to analyze successful solutions that have been implemented in other countries. Objectives: This study aimed to make an international benchmark of BHC’s governance models and look for good practices in other countries in order to study the possibility of their implementation at the Moroccan level. Methods: We benchmarked BHC's governance models by determining the criteria for selecting the benchmark countries. We have selected five countries, namely: Turkey, Malaysia, France, Chile, Rwanda. We analyzed governance models based on the five dimensions of the World Bank study "Governing Mandatory Health Insurance: Learning from Experience", which are: Coherence of the decision-making structure, stakeholder involvement, transparency and access to information, supervision and regulation, coherence and stability. Results: Our analysis based on the five dimensions showed that there are relative common factors with the governance model between the benchmark countries that allowed them to achieve universal health coverage, however, each country has introduced innovative rules and solutions adapted to its context and constraints. There are several good governance practices that we have drawn from this benchmark. Morocco can use these good practices to improve its governance model for BHC. An adaptation effort is necessary, taking into consideration the existing situation. Discussion: There is not a governance model suitable for all countries. Each country is trying to find a formula that will allow it to overcome its challenges. Morocco can draw inspiration from these models to instaure good practices to adopt, but this cannot happen without repositioning the governance of health coverage in the government's strategic vision in relation to the social protection agenda and the objectives of the health system. Conclusion: Improved governance has a direct impact on the performance of the basic health coverage system. In this sense, Morocco must take this aspect into consideration in the process of achieving universal health coverage as many other countries that have made this great step forward.

Journal of Medical and Surgical Research
Mohammed V University (MA)
Openalex Percentile: Top 63%
Healthcare Systems and Reforms
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.