Seawater electrolysis at ultra-high current density: A comparative analysis of cylindrical versus conical electrodes

Seawater electrolysis preferentially leans towards Chlorine Evolution Reaction (CER) over Oxygen Evolution Reactions (OER) under conventional conditions, but OER becomes more dominant at sufficiently higher current densities. In this study, we evaluated the effector of cylindrical and conical electrode geometries on CER and hydrogen production at high current density (i.e., >1 A cm −2 ). We found the point of lowest CER within a voltage range of 40 V–90 V. Conical electrodes, optimized to reduce CER, produced a magnitude less chloride (502 ppb) than cylindrical electrodes (1485 ppb) at nearly double the current density (∼12 and ∼6 A cm −2 respectively). However, this reduction in CER with conical electrodes was accompanied by a 25% decrease in hydrogen production. In addition, both cylindrical and conical electrodes were able to heat 500 ml of seawater by approximately 6–7 °C over a 2-min period with cylindrical electrodes heating slightly less than conical electrodes. • Comparison between cylindrical and conical graphite electrodes. • Conical electrodes suppress CER by 66% compared to cylindrical electrodes. • Cylindrical electrodes produce 25% more hydrogen at CER minima over conical. • Finite-element modeling reveals electrical potential 50x higher than conventional.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Hydrogen Energy
Published
2025-03-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2025.03.003
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Electrocatalysts for Energy Conversion
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.73

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Seawater electrolysis at ultra-high current density: A comparative analysis of cylindrical versus conical electrodes

Jacob H. Sands, John W. Koster, Søren A. Tornøe, Nobuhiko P. Kobayashi et al.
2 citations
International Journal of Hydrogen Energy
Electrocatalysts for Energy Conversion
0.73
article

Seawater electrolysis at ultra-high current density: A comparative analysis of cylindrical versus conical electrodes

Jacob H. Sands, John W. Koster, Søren A. Tornøe, Nobuhiko P. Kobayashi, Andy V. Surin
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Seawater electrolysis preferentially leans towards Chlorine Evolution Reaction (CER) over Oxygen Evolution Reactions (OER) under conventional conditions, but OER becomes more dominant at sufficiently higher current densities. In this study, we evaluated the effector of cylindrical and conical electrode geometries on CER and hydrogen production at high current density (i.e., >1 A cm −2 ). We found the point of lowest CER within a voltage range of 40 V–90 V. Conical electrodes, optimized to reduce CER, produced a magnitude less chloride (502 ppb) than cylindrical electrodes (1485 ppb) at nearly double the current density (∼12 and ∼6 A cm −2 respectively). However, this reduction in CER with conical electrodes was accompanied by a 25% decrease in hydrogen production. In addition, both cylindrical and conical electrodes were able to heat 500 ml of seawater by approximately 6–7 °C over a 2-min period with cylindrical electrodes heating slightly less than conical electrodes. • Comparison between cylindrical and conical graphite electrodes. • Conical electrodes suppress CER by 66% compared to cylindrical electrodes. • Cylindrical electrodes produce 25% more hydrogen at CER minima over conical. • Finite-element modeling reveals electrical potential 50x higher than conventional.

International Journal of Hydrogen EnergyVol. 114
University of California, Santa Cruz (US)
University of California, Santa Cruz
Life below water
Openalex Percentile: Top 33%
Electrocatalysts for Energy Conversion
0.73
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.