Sieving with Streaming Memory Access

We implement an optimized BGJ (Becker–Gama–Joux 2015) sieve and analyze its behavior in a study of RAM access overheads (and their minimization) in sieving algorithms for large lattice problems. Both experiment and theory points to BGJ’s inherent structure being much more memory-efficient than the BDGL (Becker–Ducas– Gama–Laahoven 2016) sieve, which uses asymptotically the fewest logical operations. In particular, a dimension-n BGJ sieve uses only 20.2075n+o(n) streaming (non-random) main memory accesses. A key insight: Bucket sizes decrease by orders of magnitude after each BGJ filtering layer, so that sub-buckets fit into successively much smaller (hence faster) storage areas. Our refined BGJ is competitive at cryptographic sizes and should outperform BDGL for all practically achievable dimensions.The above is corroborated by the results from our efficient CPU-based BGJ implementation in an optimized framework, which saves about 40% RAM footprint and is ≥ 24.5x more efficient gate-count-wise compared to the Ducas–Stevens–van Woerden 2021 4-GPU implementation, which like most prior sieving-based SVP computations is a HK3 (Herold–Kirshanova 2017) sieve. Notably, we solved the 183-dimensional SVP Darmstadt Challenge in 30 days on a 112-core server and 0.87 TB of RAM; similarly we also found a short vector in the 796-dimensional Ideal-SVP Challenge. Our implementation may offer further insights into the behavior of asymptotically “fast” sieving algorithms when applied to large-scale problems. Moreover, our refined cost estimation of SVP based on this implementation suggests that some NIST PQC candidates (e.g. Falcon-512), are not sure to meet NIST’s security requirements.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
IACR Transactions on Cryptographic Hardware and Embedded Systems
Published
2025-03-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.46586/tches.v2025.i2.362-384
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Parallel Computing and Optimization Techniques
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.54
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Sieving with Streaming Memory Access

Ziyu Zhao, Jintai Ding, Bo-Yin Yang
2 citations
IACR Transactions on Cryptographic Hardware and Embedded Systems
Parallel Computing and Optimization Techniques
4.54
article

Sieving with Streaming Memory Access

Ziyu Zhao, Jintai Ding, Bo-Yin Yang
article en
2 citations

Abstract

We implement an optimized BGJ (Becker–Gama–Joux 2015) sieve and analyze its behavior in a study of RAM access overheads (and their minimization) in sieving algorithms for large lattice problems. Both experiment and theory points to BGJ’s inherent structure being much more memory-efficient than the BDGL (Becker–Ducas– Gama–Laahoven 2016) sieve, which uses asymptotically the fewest logical operations. In particular, a dimension-n BGJ sieve uses only 20.2075n+o(n) streaming (non-random) main memory accesses. A key insight: Bucket sizes decrease by orders of magnitude after each BGJ filtering layer, so that sub-buckets fit into successively much smaller (hence faster) storage areas. Our refined BGJ is competitive at cryptographic sizes and should outperform BDGL for all practically achievable dimensions.The above is corroborated by the results from our efficient CPU-based BGJ implementation in an optimized framework, which saves about 40% RAM footprint and is ≥ 24.5x more efficient gate-count-wise compared to the Ducas–Stevens–van Woerden 2021 4-GPU implementation, which like most prior sieving-based SVP computations is a HK3 (Herold–Kirshanova 2017) sieve. Notably, we solved the 183-dimensional SVP Darmstadt Challenge in 30 days on a 112-core server and 0.87 TB of RAM; similarly we also found a short vector in the 796-dimensional Ideal-SVP Challenge. Our implementation may offer further insights into the behavior of asymptotically “fast” sieving algorithms when applied to large-scale problems. Moreover, our refined cost estimation of SVP based on this implementation suggests that some NIST PQC candidates (e.g. Falcon-512), are not sure to meet NIST’s security requirements.

IACR Transactions on Cryptographic Hardware and Embedded SystemsVol. 2025(2)
Xi’an Jiaotong-Liverpool University (CN), Academia Sinica (TW), Tsinghua University (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Parallel Computing and Optimization Techniques
4.54
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.