A Compromised Maxillofacial Wound Healing Model for Characterization of Particulate Bone Grafting: An In Vivo Study in Rabbits

Preclinical testing of tissue engineering modalities are commonly performed in a healthy wound bed. These conditions do not represent clinically relevant compromised oral wound environments due to radiation treatments seen clinically. This study aimed to characterize the bone regeneration outcomes in critical-sized mandibular defects using particulate grafting in an irradiated preclinical model of compromised wound healing. Sixteen New Zealand white rabbits were divided into two groups (n = 8/group), namely (i) irradiated (experimental) and (ii) non-irradiated (control). The rabbits in the experimental group received a total of 36 Gy radiation, followed by surgical intervention to create critical-sized (10 mm), full-thickness mandibular defects. The control group was subjected to the same surgical intervention. All defects were filled with bovine bone grafting material (Bio-Oss, Geistlich, Princeton, NJ, USA) and allowed to heal for 8 weeks. At the study endpoint, rabbits were euthanized, and their mandibles were harvested for micro-computed tomographic, histological, and histomorphometric processing and analysis. Qualitative histological analysis revealed increased levels of bone formation and bridging in the control group relative to the experimental group. This was accompanied by increased levels of soft tissue presence in the experimental group. Volumetric reconstruction showed a significantly higher degree of bone in the control group (27.59% ± 2.71), relative to the experimental group (22.02% ± 2.71) (p = 0.001). The irradiated rabbit model exhibited decreased bone regeneration capacity relative to the healthy subjects, highlighting its suitability as a robust compromised wound healing environment for further preclinical testing involving growth factors or customized, high-fidelity 3D printed tissue engineering scaffolds.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Biomedical Materials Research Part B Applied Biomaterials
Published
2025-03-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/jbm.b.35556
Primary Topic
Bone Tissue Engineering Materials
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A Compromised Maxillofacial Wound Healing Model for Characterization of Particulate Bone Grafting: An In Vivo Study in Rabbits

F. Kurtis Kasper, Nicholas A. Mirsky, William Norton, Neeraja Dharmaraj et al.
Journal of Biomedical Materials Research Part B Applied Biomaterials
Bone Tissue Engineering Materials
article

A Compromised Maxillofacial Wound Healing Model for Characterization of Particulate Bone Grafting: An In Vivo Study in Rabbits

F. Kurtis Kasper, Nicholas A. Mirsky, William Norton, Neeraja Dharmaraj, Vasudev Vivekanand Nayak, Lukasz Witek, Paulo G. Coelho, Simon Young, Ramesh Tailor, Louis S. Ramagli, N. Hussein
article en

Abstract

Preclinical testing of tissue engineering modalities are commonly performed in a healthy wound bed. These conditions do not represent clinically relevant compromised oral wound environments due to radiation treatments seen clinically. This study aimed to characterize the bone regeneration outcomes in critical-sized mandibular defects using particulate grafting in an irradiated preclinical model of compromised wound healing. Sixteen New Zealand white rabbits were divided into two groups (n = 8/group), namely (i) irradiated (experimental) and (ii) non-irradiated (control). The rabbits in the experimental group received a total of 36 Gy radiation, followed by surgical intervention to create critical-sized (10 mm), full-thickness mandibular defects. The control group was subjected to the same surgical intervention. All defects were filled with bovine bone grafting material (Bio-Oss, Geistlich, Princeton, NJ, USA) and allowed to heal for 8 weeks. At the study endpoint, rabbits were euthanized, and their mandibles were harvested for micro-computed tomographic, histological, and histomorphometric processing and analysis. Qualitative histological analysis revealed increased levels of bone formation and bridging in the control group relative to the experimental group. This was accompanied by increased levels of soft tissue presence in the experimental group. Volumetric reconstruction showed a significantly higher degree of bone in the control group (27.59% ± 2.71), relative to the experimental group (22.02% ± 2.71) (p = 0.001). The irradiated rabbit model exhibited decreased bone regeneration capacity relative to the healthy subjects, highlighting its suitability as a robust compromised wound healing environment for further preclinical testing involving growth factors or customized, high-fidelity 3D printed tissue engineering scaffolds.

Journal of Biomedical Materials Research Part B Applied BiomaterialsVol. 113(3)
The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center (US), University of Miami (US), Dr. John T. Macdonald Foundation (US), New York University (US), The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston (US)
Osteo Science Foundation
Openalex Percentile: Top 96%
Bone Tissue Engineering Materials
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.