Utilisation of Anthropogenic Food by Red Foxes (<scp><i>Vulpes vulpes</i></scp>) in Britain as Determined by Stable Isotope Analysis

Dietary analyses utilising visual methods to identify stomach and faecal contents have shown that urban red foxes (<i>Vulpes vulpes</i>) in Britain consume human-derived (anthropogenic) food to varying degrees. Anthropogenic foods have been implicated in poor health outcomes for synanthropic species that consume them; therefore, it is important to examine the degree of such foods in the British fox diet. We analysed the carbon (δ<sup>13</sup>C) and nitrogen (δ<sup>15</sup>N) stable isotope ratios of whiskers collected from 93 foxes from across Britain to determine: (1) if stable isotope analysis (SIA) distinguished a difference in δ<sup>13</sup>C and δ<sup>15</sup>N between rural and urban foxes, and whether any difference was suggestive of anthropogenic food use; (2) the proportion of anthropogenic food consumption in urban foxes compared to rural foxes using a Bayesian mixing model; (3) whether sex, age or season of collection influenced fox diet as assessed by SIA, in relation to anthropogenic food use. We found the following: (1) urban fox diet was significantly different to rural foxes; urban foxes demonstrated significantly higher δ<sup>13</sup>C and lower δ<sup>15</sup>N, a pattern consistent with anthropogenic food consumption. (2) Food provided either directly or indirectly by humans contributed an estimated 34.6% of urban fox diet compared to approximately 6% of rural fox diet. (3) Across rural and urban foxes combined, there were significant isotopic differences between males and females, with females demonstrating higher δ<sup>13</sup>C. (4) No differences in δ<sup>13</sup>C and δ<sup>15</sup>N between subadults and adults were observed. (5) Season did not have a significant influence on δ<sup>13</sup>C and δ<sup>15</sup>N, despite winter demonstrating the highest δ<sup>13</sup>C and lowest δ<sup>15</sup>N seasonal means. Potential negative outcomes of anthropogenic food consumption are likely to disproportionately impact females more than males and urban-dwelling foxes more than rural foxes.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Ecology and Evolution
Published
2025-02-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.70844
Citations
5
Primary Topic
Isotope Analysis in Ecology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
8.58

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Utilisation of Anthropogenic Food by Red Foxes (Vulpes vulpes) in Britain as Determined by Stable Isotope Analysis

Jason Newton, Ruth Cox, Paul M. Cropper, J. W. Fletcher et al.
5 citations
Ecology and Evolution
Isotope Analysis in Ecology
8.58
article

Utilisation of Anthropogenic Food by Red Foxes (Vulpes vulpes) in Britain as Determined by Stable Isotope Analysis

Jason Newton, Ruth Cox, Paul M. Cropper, J. W. Fletcher, Simon Tollington, Bryony A. Tolhurst, Rona A. R. McGill, Krishnaveni Illa, Dawn M. Scott, Naomi Berry
article en
5 citations

Abstract

Dietary analyses utilising visual methods to identify stomach and faecal contents have shown that urban red foxes (<i>Vulpes vulpes</i>) in Britain consume human-derived (anthropogenic) food to varying degrees. Anthropogenic foods have been implicated in poor health outcomes for synanthropic species that consume them; therefore, it is important to examine the degree of such foods in the British fox diet. We analysed the carbon (δ<sup>13</sup>C) and nitrogen (δ<sup>15</sup>N) stable isotope ratios of whiskers collected from 93 foxes from across Britain to determine: (1) if stable isotope analysis (SIA) distinguished a difference in δ<sup>13</sup>C and δ<sup>15</sup>N between rural and urban foxes, and whether any difference was suggestive of anthropogenic food use; (2) the proportion of anthropogenic food consumption in urban foxes compared to rural foxes using a Bayesian mixing model; (3) whether sex, age or season of collection influenced fox diet as assessed by SIA, in relation to anthropogenic food use. We found the following: (1) urban fox diet was significantly different to rural foxes; urban foxes demonstrated significantly higher δ<sup>13</sup>C and lower δ<sup>15</sup>N, a pattern consistent with anthropogenic food consumption. (2) Food provided either directly or indirectly by humans contributed an estimated 34.6% of urban fox diet compared to approximately 6% of rural fox diet. (3) Across rural and urban foxes combined, there were significant isotopic differences between males and females, with females demonstrating higher δ<sup>13</sup>C. (4) No differences in δ<sup>13</sup>C and δ<sup>15</sup>N between subadults and adults were observed. (5) Season did not have a significant influence on δ<sup>13</sup>C and δ<sup>15</sup>N, despite winter demonstrating the highest δ<sup>13</sup>C and lowest δ<sup>15</sup>N seasonal means. Potential negative outcomes of anthropogenic food consumption are likely to disproportionately impact females more than males and urban-dwelling foxes more than rural foxes.

Ecology and EvolutionVol. 15(3)
Animal and Plant Health Agency (GB), Scottish Universities Environmental Research Centre (GB), Nottingham Trent University (GB), University of Brighton (GB), University of Glasgow (GB)
Nottingham Trent University
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Isotope Analysis in Ecology
8.58
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.