Utilisation of Anthropogenic Food by Red Foxes (<scp><i>Vulpes vulpes</i></scp>) in Britain as Determined by Stable Isotope Analysis
Dietary analyses utilising visual methods to identify stomach and faecal contents have shown that urban red foxes (<i>Vulpes vulpes</i>) in Britain consume human-derived (anthropogenic) food to varying degrees. Anthropogenic foods have been implicated in poor health outcomes for synanthropic species that consume them; therefore, it is important to examine the degree of such foods in the British fox diet. We analysed the carbon (δ<sup>13</sup>C) and nitrogen (δ<sup>15</sup>N) stable isotope ratios of whiskers collected from 93 foxes from across Britain to determine: (1) if stable isotope analysis (SIA) distinguished a difference in δ<sup>13</sup>C and δ<sup>15</sup>N between rural and urban foxes, and whether any difference was suggestive of anthropogenic food use; (2) the proportion of anthropogenic food consumption in urban foxes compared to rural foxes using a Bayesian mixing model; (3) whether sex, age or season of collection influenced fox diet as assessed by SIA, in relation to anthropogenic food use. We found the following: (1) urban fox diet was significantly different to rural foxes; urban foxes demonstrated significantly higher δ<sup>13</sup>C and lower δ<sup>15</sup>N, a pattern consistent with anthropogenic food consumption. (2) Food provided either directly or indirectly by humans contributed an estimated 34.6% of urban fox diet compared to approximately 6% of rural fox diet. (3) Across rural and urban foxes combined, there were significant isotopic differences between males and females, with females demonstrating higher δ<sup>13</sup>C. (4) No differences in δ<sup>13</sup>C and δ<sup>15</sup>N between subadults and adults were observed. (5) Season did not have a significant influence on δ<sup>13</sup>C and δ<sup>15</sup>N, despite winter demonstrating the highest δ<sup>13</sup>C and lowest δ<sup>15</sup>N seasonal means. Potential negative outcomes of anthropogenic food consumption are likely to disproportionately impact females more than males and urban-dwelling foxes more than rural foxes.
Authors
- Jason Newton (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7594-3693)
- Ruth Cox (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9298-438X)
- Paul M. Cropper (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0320-5779)
- J. W. Fletcher (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0009-0002-4351-5488)
- Simon Tollington (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2450-7255)
- Bryony A. Tolhurst (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0198-5046)
- Rona A. R. McGill (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0400-7288)
- Krishnaveni Illa
- Dawn M. Scott (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9570-2739)
- Naomi Berry
Institutions
- Animal and Plant Health Agency (GB)
- Scottish Universities Environmental Research Centre (GB)
- Nottingham Trent University (GB)
- University of Brighton (GB)
- University of Glasgow (GB)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Ecology and Evolution
- Published
- 2025-02-28
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.70844
- Citations
- 5
- Primary Topic
- Isotope Analysis in Ecology
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 8.58
Funders
- Nottingham Trent University