Theorising the “humanisation” of refugees: a decolonial approach

While there is growing literature on the dehumanisation of refugees, there is comparatively little theorisation of humanisation. Humanisation is often assumed to be a progressive move of recognising the common humanity of refugees. Naming this the “humanisation as inclusion” thesis, I use decolonial theory to challenge the dichotomy between dehumanisation/exclusion and humanisation/inclusion. Based on thematic analysis of scholarship on the humanisation of refugees during the “European refugee crisis”, I identify four main elements that comprise the concept of humanisation: individualisation, common humanity, empathy, and voice. I use those elements to illustrate how a decolonial approach to humanisation sheds light on the modern/colonial hierarchies that continue to organise who is considered human, and problematises which humanity refugees are excluded from/included into. This broadens the scope of scholarship on humanisation and refugees: from whether refugees are included into humanity, to revealing and reimagining who is defining the human, and for what purpose.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Ethnic and Racial Studies
Published
2025-03-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/01419870.2025.2468265
Citations
4
Primary Topic
Migration, Refugees, and Integration
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
16.81

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Theorising the “humanisation” of refugees: a decolonial approach

Moe Suzuki
4 citations
Ethnic and Racial Studies
Migration, Refugees, and Integration
16.81
article

Theorising the “humanisation” of refugees: a decolonial approach

Moe Suzuki
article en
4 citations

Abstract

While there is growing literature on the dehumanisation of refugees, there is comparatively little theorisation of humanisation. Humanisation is often assumed to be a progressive move of recognising the common humanity of refugees. Naming this the “humanisation as inclusion” thesis, I use decolonial theory to challenge the dichotomy between dehumanisation/exclusion and humanisation/inclusion. Based on thematic analysis of scholarship on the humanisation of refugees during the “European refugee crisis”, I identify four main elements that comprise the concept of humanisation: individualisation, common humanity, empathy, and voice. I use those elements to illustrate how a decolonial approach to humanisation sheds light on the modern/colonial hierarchies that continue to organise who is considered human, and problematises which humanity refugees are excluded from/included into. This broadens the scope of scholarship on humanisation and refugees: from whether refugees are included into humanity, to revealing and reimagining who is defining the human, and for what purpose.

Ethnic and Racial StudiesVol. 48(13)
London School of Economics and Political Science (GB)
London School of Economics and Political Science
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 1%
Migration, Refugees, and Integration
16.81
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Theorising the “humanisation” of refugees: a decolonial approach — Moe Suzuki · Ethnic and Racial Studies (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS