Investigating student engagement with AI-driven feedback in translation revision: A mixed-methods study

Abstract Despite the well-established importance of feedback in education, the application of Artificial Intelligence (AI)-generated feedback, particularly from language models like ChatGPT, remains understudied in translation education. This study investigates the engagement of Master’s students in translation with ChatGPT-generated feedback during their revision process. A mixed-methods approach, combining a translation-and-revision experiment with quantitative and qualitative analyses, was employed to examine the feedback, translations before and after revision, the revision process, and student reflections. The results reveal complex interrelations among cognitive, affective, and behavioural dimensions influencing students’ engagement with AI feedback and their subsequent revisions. Specifically, the findings indicate that students invested considerable cognitive effort in the revision process, despite finding the feedback comprehensible. Moreover, they exhibited moderate affective satisfaction with the feedback model. Behaviourally, their actions were largely influenced by cognitive and affective factors, although some inconsistencies were observed. This research provides novel insights into the potential applications of AI-generated feedback in translation teaching and opens avenues for further investigation into the integration of AI tools in language teaching settings.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Education and Information Technologies
Published
2025-03-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-025-13457-0
Citations
24
Primary Topic
Interpreting and Communication in Healthcare
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
67.57

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Investigating student engagement with AI-driven feedback in translation revision: A mixed-methods study

Yanfang Su, Simin Xu, Kanglong Liu
24 citations
Education and Information Technologies
Interpreting and Communication in Healthcare
67.57
article

Investigating student engagement with AI-driven feedback in translation revision: A mixed-methods study

Yanfang Su, Simin Xu, Kanglong Liu
article en
24 citations

Abstract

Abstract Despite the well-established importance of feedback in education, the application of Artificial Intelligence (AI)-generated feedback, particularly from language models like ChatGPT, remains understudied in translation education. This study investigates the engagement of Master’s students in translation with ChatGPT-generated feedback during their revision process. A mixed-methods approach, combining a translation-and-revision experiment with quantitative and qualitative analyses, was employed to examine the feedback, translations before and after revision, the revision process, and student reflections. The results reveal complex interrelations among cognitive, affective, and behavioural dimensions influencing students’ engagement with AI feedback and their subsequent revisions. Specifically, the findings indicate that students invested considerable cognitive effort in the revision process, despite finding the feedback comprehensible. Moreover, they exhibited moderate affective satisfaction with the feedback model. Behaviourally, their actions were largely influenced by cognitive and affective factors, although some inconsistencies were observed. This research provides novel insights into the potential applications of AI-generated feedback in translation teaching and opens avenues for further investigation into the integration of AI tools in language teaching settings.

Education and Information TechnologiesVol. 30(12)
Hong Kong Polytechnic University (HK)
Hong Kong Polytechnic University
Openalex Percentile: Top 0%
Interpreting and Communication in Healthcare
67.57
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.