A care ethical perspective on family caregiver burden and support

Family care-when partners, relatives, or other proxies care for each other in case of illness, disability, or frailty-is increasingly considered an important pillar for the sustainability of care systems. For many people, taking on a caring role is self-evident. Especially in a palliative care context, however, family care can be challenging. Witnessing caregivers' challenges may prompt compassionate nurses to undertake actions to reduce burden by adjusting tasks or activities. Using a care ethical approach, this theoretical paper aims to provide nurses with an alternative perspective on caregiver burden and support. Drawing on the concepts of relationality and contextuality, we explain that family care often is not a well-demarcated or actively chosen task. Instead, it is a practice of responding to an all-encompassing "call" to care flowing from a relationship, within a social and cultural context where norms, motivations, and expectations shape people's (sometimes limitless) care. We consider relational interdependence at the root of persisting in care provision. The question is then whether self-sacrifice is a problem that nurses should immediately solve. In ideal circumstances, self-sacrifice is the result of a conscious balancing act between values, but family care in the context of serious illness barely provides room for reflection. Yet, instant attempts to alleviate burden may overlook family caregivers' values and the inherent moral ambiguities and/or ambivalent feelings within family care. Family care is complex and highly personal, as is finding an adequate balance in fulfilling one's sometimes conflicting values, motivations, and social expectations. Therefore, we suggest that caregiver experiences should always be interpreted in an explorative dialogue, focused on what caring means to a particular family caregiver. Nurses do not have to liberate family caregivers <i>from</i> the situation but should support them <i>in</i> whatever overwhelms or drives them in standing-by their loved ones until the end.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Nursing Ethics
Published
2025-03-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/09697330251324294
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Intergenerational Family Dynamics and Caregiving
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
8.40

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A care ethical perspective on family caregiver burden and support

Maaike M. Haan, Jelle van Gurp, Gert Olthuis, Marianne Boenink
2 citations
Nursing Ethics
Intergenerational Family Dynamics and Caregiving
8.40
article

A care ethical perspective on family caregiver burden and support

Maaike M. Haan, Jelle van Gurp, Gert Olthuis, Marianne Boenink
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Family care-when partners, relatives, or other proxies care for each other in case of illness, disability, or frailty-is increasingly considered an important pillar for the sustainability of care systems. For many people, taking on a caring role is self-evident. Especially in a palliative care context, however, family care can be challenging. Witnessing caregivers' challenges may prompt compassionate nurses to undertake actions to reduce burden by adjusting tasks or activities. Using a care ethical approach, this theoretical paper aims to provide nurses with an alternative perspective on caregiver burden and support. Drawing on the concepts of relationality and contextuality, we explain that family care often is not a well-demarcated or actively chosen task. Instead, it is a practice of responding to an all-encompassing "call" to care flowing from a relationship, within a social and cultural context where norms, motivations, and expectations shape people's (sometimes limitless) care. We consider relational interdependence at the root of persisting in care provision. The question is then whether self-sacrifice is a problem that nurses should immediately solve. In ideal circumstances, self-sacrifice is the result of a conscious balancing act between values, but family care in the context of serious illness barely provides room for reflection. Yet, instant attempts to alleviate burden may overlook family caregivers' values and the inherent moral ambiguities and/or ambivalent feelings within family care. Family care is complex and highly personal, as is finding an adequate balance in fulfilling one's sometimes conflicting values, motivations, and social expectations. Therefore, we suggest that caregiver experiences should always be interpreted in an explorative dialogue, focused on what caring means to a particular family caregiver. Nurses do not have to liberate family caregivers <i>from</i> the situation but should support them <i>in</i> whatever overwhelms or drives them in standing-by their loved ones until the end.

Nursing EthicsVol. 32(6)
Radboud University Nijmegen (NL), University Medical Center (US), Radboud University Medical Center (NL)
ZonMw
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Intergenerational Family Dynamics and Caregiving
8.40
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.