Responses of the carotid artery to acute, fractionated or chronic ionizing irradiation, and differences from the aorta

The circulatory system receives ionizing radiation at various dose rates. Given mounting epidemiological evidence of elevated radiation risks for diseases of the circulatory system (DCS), the International Commission on Radiological Protection recently recommended the first ever dose threshold for DCS. However, very little knowledge exists about whether radiation effects differ with dose rates and among tissues of the circulatory system. Here, we investigated the impact of dose rates in the carotid artery (CA) and compared it with the aorta. CA was obtained from mice irradiated with the same total dose that was delivered either acutely, 25 fractions, 100 fractions or chronically. CA underwent immunofluorescence and histochemistry staining. Irradiation led to vascular damage, inflammation and fibrosis in CA. The integrative analysis for 14 prelesional endpoints revealed that the magnitude of carotid changes was greater in 25 fractions, smaller in 100 fractions, and much smaller in chronic irradiation, compared with acute irradiation. Radiation responses of the aorta were qualitatively similar to, but quantitatively greater than those of CA. Irradiation causes sparing and enhancing dose protraction effects in a manner that is not a simple function of dose rate, and that radiosensitivity varies within the circulatory system.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Scientific Reports
Published
2025-03-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-92710-5
Citations
6
Primary Topic
Radiation Dose and Imaging
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
8.16
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Responses of the carotid artery to acute, fractionated or chronic ionizing irradiation, and differences from the aorta

Yukihito Higashi, Seiko Hirota, Ayumu Nakashima, Takaharu Nomura et al.
6 citations
Scientific Reports
Radiation Dose and Imaging
8.16
article

Responses of the carotid artery to acute, fractionated or chronic ionizing irradiation, and differences from the aorta

Yukihito Higashi, Seiko Hirota, Ayumu Nakashima, Takaharu Nomura, Y. Saito, Shinji Yoshinaga, Ki-ichiro Kawano, Nobuyuki Hamada, Farina Mohamad Yusoff
article en
6 citations

Abstract

The circulatory system receives ionizing radiation at various dose rates. Given mounting epidemiological evidence of elevated radiation risks for diseases of the circulatory system (DCS), the International Commission on Radiological Protection recently recommended the first ever dose threshold for DCS. However, very little knowledge exists about whether radiation effects differ with dose rates and among tissues of the circulatory system. Here, we investigated the impact of dose rates in the carotid artery (CA) and compared it with the aorta. CA was obtained from mice irradiated with the same total dose that was delivered either acutely, 25 fractions, 100 fractions or chronically. CA underwent immunofluorescence and histochemistry staining. Irradiation led to vascular damage, inflammation and fibrosis in CA. The integrative analysis for 14 prelesional endpoints revealed that the magnitude of carotid changes was greater in 25 fractions, smaller in 100 fractions, and much smaller in chronic irradiation, compared with acute irradiation. Radiation responses of the aorta were qualitatively similar to, but quantitatively greater than those of CA. Irradiation causes sparing and enhancing dose protraction effects in a manner that is not a simple function of dose rate, and that radiosensitivity varies within the circulatory system.

Scientific ReportsVol. 15(1)
Hiroshima University (JP), Central Research Institute of Electric Power Industry (JP), Hiroshima University Hospital (JP)
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Radiation Dose and Imaging
8.16
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.