Psychometric Validation of the CD-RISC-10 Among Chinese Construction Project High-Place Workers

Individuals with high psychological resilience cope with stress more effectively. It is crucial to select a suitable psychological resilience tool for workers in high-risk industries to identify and help those with lower resilience early on, protecting their health and reducing accidents. The CD-RISC-10 is widely used, and this study assessed its validity and reliability among Chinese construction workers, focusing on workers on elevated platforms. A total of 325 valid CD-RISC-10 scales were collected and analyzed using statistical methods, such as exploratory factor analysis, confirmatory factor analysis, and K-means cluster analysis. The results show that the CD-RISC-10 can effectively measure psychological resilience with a high scale reliability of 0.857, and it had an acceptable model fit (CFI = 0.947) and good item discrimination. About 17.23% of the measured sample of Chinese workers working at height were identified as having resilience impairments, and demographic variables such as age, length of service, educational level, and accident experience had a significant impact on the level of resilience, revealing the heterogeneity of the workers. This study validated the measurement validity of the CD-RISC-10 scale among Chinese high-place workers, and the analysis results were conducive to conducting psychological resilience assessments, improving workers’ occupational health, and promoting the sustainable development of construction enterprises.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Buildings
Published
2025-03-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings15050822
Primary Topic
Resilience and Mental Health
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Psychometric Validation of the CD-RISC-10 Among Chinese Construction Project High-Place Workers

Jingqi Gao, Zhimin Li, Xiang Wu, Ruiming Fan et al.
Buildings
Resilience and Mental Health
article

Psychometric Validation of the CD-RISC-10 Among Chinese Construction Project High-Place Workers

Jingqi Gao, Zhimin Li, Xiang Wu, Ruiming Fan, Runqiao Zhang
article en

Abstract

Individuals with high psychological resilience cope with stress more effectively. It is crucial to select a suitable psychological resilience tool for workers in high-risk industries to identify and help those with lower resilience early on, protecting their health and reducing accidents. The CD-RISC-10 is widely used, and this study assessed its validity and reliability among Chinese construction workers, focusing on workers on elevated platforms. A total of 325 valid CD-RISC-10 scales were collected and analyzed using statistical methods, such as exploratory factor analysis, confirmatory factor analysis, and K-means cluster analysis. The results show that the CD-RISC-10 can effectively measure psychological resilience with a high scale reliability of 0.857, and it had an acceptable model fit (CFI = 0.947) and good item discrimination. About 17.23% of the measured sample of Chinese workers working at height were identified as having resilience impairments, and demographic variables such as age, length of service, educational level, and accident experience had a significant impact on the level of resilience, revealing the heterogeneity of the workers. This study validated the measurement validity of the CD-RISC-10 scale among Chinese high-place workers, and the analysis results were conducive to conducting psychological resilience assessments, improving workers’ occupational health, and promoting the sustainable development of construction enterprises.

BuildingsVol. 15(5)
State Grid Corporation of China (China) (CN), China University of Geosciences (Beijing) (CN), China Academy of Safety Sciences and Technology (CN)
Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities
Openalex Percentile: Top 94%
Resilience and Mental Health
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.