Weighted Answer Similarity Analysis

Romero et al. (2015; see also Wollack, 1997) developed the <i>ω</i> statistic as a method for detecting unusually similar answers between pairs of examinees. For each pair, the <i>ω</i> statistic considers whether the observed number of similar answers is significantly larger than the expected number of similar answers. However, one limitation of <i>ω</i> is that it does not account for the particular items on which similar answers are observed. Therefore, in this study, we propose a weighted version of the <i>ω</i> statistic that takes this information into account. We compare the performance of the new and existing statistics using detailed simulations in which several factors are manipulated. Results show that while both the new and existing statistics are able to control the Type I error rate, the new statistic is more powerful, on average.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Applied Psychological Measurement
Published
2025-03-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/01466216251322353
Primary Topic
Bayesian Modeling and Causal Inference
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Weighted Answer Similarity Analysis

Kylie Gorney, Nicholas Trout
Applied Psychological Measurement
Bayesian Modeling and Causal Inference
article

Weighted Answer Similarity Analysis

Kylie Gorney, Nicholas Trout
article en

Abstract

Romero et al. (2015; see also Wollack, 1997) developed the <i>ω</i> statistic as a method for detecting unusually similar answers between pairs of examinees. For each pair, the <i>ω</i> statistic considers whether the observed number of similar answers is significantly larger than the expected number of similar answers. However, one limitation of <i>ω</i> is that it does not account for the particular items on which similar answers are observed. Therefore, in this study, we propose a weighted version of the <i>ω</i> statistic that takes this information into account. We compare the performance of the new and existing statistics using detailed simulations in which several factors are manipulated. Results show that while both the new and existing statistics are able to control the Type I error rate, the new statistic is more powerful, on average.

Applied Psychological Measurement
Michigan State University (US)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 98%
Bayesian Modeling and Causal Inference
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Weighted Answer Similarity Analysis — Kylie Gorney, Nicholas Trout · Applied Psychological Measurement (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS