How do the resting EEG preprocessing states affect the outcomes of postprocessing?

Plenty of artifact removal tools and pipelines have been developed to correct the resting EEG waves and discover scientific values behind. Without expertised visual inspection, it is susceptible to derive improper preprocessing, resulting in either insufficient preprocessed EEG (IPE) or excessive preprocessed EEG (EPE). However, little is known about the impacts of IPE or EPE on postprocessing in the temporal, frequency, and spatial domains, particularly as to the spectra and the functional connectivity analysis. Here, the clean EEG (CE) with linear and quasi-stationary assumption was synthesized as ground truth based on the New-York head model and the multivariate autoregressive model. Later, IPE and EPE were simulated by injecting Gaussian noise and losing brain components, respectively. Spectral homogeneities of all EEGs were evaluated by the proposed Parallel LOg Spectra index (PaLOSi). Then, the impacts on postprocessing were quantified by the IPE/EPE deviation from CE as to the temporal statistics, multichannel power, cross spectra, scalp EEG network properties, and source dispersion. Lastly, the association between PaLOSi and varying trends of postprocessing outcomes was analyzed with evolutionary preprocessing states. We found that compared with CE: 1) IPE (EPE) temporal statistics deviated more greatly with more noise injected (brain activities discarded); 2) IPE (EPE) power was higher (lower), and IPE power was almost parallel to that of CE across frequencies, while EPE power deviation decreased with higher frequencies; IPE cross spectra deviated more greatly than EPE, except for β band; 3) derived from 7 coupling measures, IPE (EPE) network had lower (higher) transmission efficiency and worse (better) integration ability; 4) IPE sources distributed more dispersedly with greater strength while EPE sources activated more focally with lower amplitudes; 5) PaLOSi was consistently correlated with varying trends of investigated postprocessing for both simulated and real data. This study shed light on how the postprocessing outcomes are affected by the preprocessing states and PaLOSi is a promising quality control metric for creating normative EEG databases.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
NeuroImage
Published
2025-03-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2025.121122
Citations
6
Primary Topic
EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
8.59

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

How do the resting EEG preprocessing states affect the outcomes of postprocessing?

Pedro A. Valdés‐Sosa, Shiang Hu, Zhao Lv, Jie Ruan
6 citations
NeuroImage
EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces
8.59
article

How do the resting EEG preprocessing states affect the outcomes of postprocessing?

Pedro A. Valdés‐Sosa, Shiang Hu, Zhao Lv, Jie Ruan
article en
6 citations

Abstract

Plenty of artifact removal tools and pipelines have been developed to correct the resting EEG waves and discover scientific values behind. Without expertised visual inspection, it is susceptible to derive improper preprocessing, resulting in either insufficient preprocessed EEG (IPE) or excessive preprocessed EEG (EPE). However, little is known about the impacts of IPE or EPE on postprocessing in the temporal, frequency, and spatial domains, particularly as to the spectra and the functional connectivity analysis. Here, the clean EEG (CE) with linear and quasi-stationary assumption was synthesized as ground truth based on the New-York head model and the multivariate autoregressive model. Later, IPE and EPE were simulated by injecting Gaussian noise and losing brain components, respectively. Spectral homogeneities of all EEGs were evaluated by the proposed Parallel LOg Spectra index (PaLOSi). Then, the impacts on postprocessing were quantified by the IPE/EPE deviation from CE as to the temporal statistics, multichannel power, cross spectra, scalp EEG network properties, and source dispersion. Lastly, the association between PaLOSi and varying trends of postprocessing outcomes was analyzed with evolutionary preprocessing states. We found that compared with CE: 1) IPE (EPE) temporal statistics deviated more greatly with more noise injected (brain activities discarded); 2) IPE (EPE) power was higher (lower), and IPE power was almost parallel to that of CE across frequencies, while EPE power deviation decreased with higher frequencies; IPE cross spectra deviated more greatly than EPE, except for β band; 3) derived from 7 coupling measures, IPE (EPE) network had lower (higher) transmission efficiency and worse (better) integration ability; 4) IPE sources distributed more dispersedly with greater strength while EPE sources activated more focally with lower amplitudes; 5) PaLOSi was consistently correlated with varying trends of investigated postprocessing for both simulated and real data. This study shed light on how the postprocessing outcomes are affected by the preprocessing states and PaLOSi is a promising quality control metric for creating normative EEG databases.

NeuroImageVol. 310
Anhui University (CN), University of Electronic Science and Technology of China (CN)
National Natural Science Foundation of China
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces
8.59
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.