“Throwing out your food is throwing out your money”: Measuring the impact and longevity of interventions on food waste in households

Consumers in Australian households contribute around 50 % of the economic value of food waste along the supply chain. Identifying effective food management behaviour change approaches is crucial to reducing this. Most food waste interventions are not evaluated, and those that are fail to take a baseline measure to identify changes. Further, it is important to identify if changes are enduring, or merely a temporary response to intervention. This paper fills this critical gap by evaluating 671 households in a randomised controlled trial (RCT) over seven months. This study implemented interventions, using principles of nudging and cognitive dissonance, to bridge the attitude-behaviour gap, measuring food waste and behaviours via online surveys. A longitudinal comparison revealed a general reduction in self-reported food waste among participants. In addition, those with higher amounts of food waste reported the largest reductions. Results support use of multi-touchpoint interventions, delivered in-home, to facilitate sustained food waste reductions.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Resources Conservation and Recycling
Published
2025-03-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2025.108222
Citations
6
Primary Topic
Food Waste Reduction and Sustainability
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
6.97
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

“Throwing out your food is throwing out your money”: Measuring the impact and longevity of interventions on food waste in households

Nazia Nabi, Emily Dunstan, David Pearson, Gamithri Gayana Karunasena et al.
6 citations
Resources Conservation and Recycling
Food Waste Reduction and Sustainability
6.97
article

“Throwing out your food is throwing out your money”: Measuring the impact and longevity of interventions on food waste in households

Nazia Nabi, Emily Dunstan, David Pearson, Gamithri Gayana Karunasena, Danica Jobson
article en
6 citations

Abstract

Consumers in Australian households contribute around 50 % of the economic value of food waste along the supply chain. Identifying effective food management behaviour change approaches is crucial to reducing this. Most food waste interventions are not evaluated, and those that are fail to take a baseline measure to identify changes. Further, it is important to identify if changes are enduring, or merely a temporary response to intervention. This paper fills this critical gap by evaluating 671 households in a randomised controlled trial (RCT) over seven months. This study implemented interventions, using principles of nudging and cognitive dissonance, to bridge the attitude-behaviour gap, measuring food waste and behaviours via online surveys. A longitudinal comparison revealed a general reduction in self-reported food waste among participants. In addition, those with higher amounts of food waste reported the largest reductions. Results support use of multi-touchpoint interventions, delivered in-home, to facilitate sustained food waste reductions.

Resources Conservation and RecyclingVol. 218
Wine Australia (AU), Australian Defence Force Academy (AU), Central Queensland University (AU)
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Food Waste Reduction and Sustainability
6.97
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.