Comparative analysis of the microbial composition of three packaged sliced dry-cured hams from a Chinese market
Ham, a widely consumed and culturally significant food, undergoes fermentation and aging processes that contribute to its distinctive flavor and texture. These processes are influenced by a complex interplay of microbial communities, which vary by the production region. Understanding these microbial dynamics can provide insights into flavor development and quality improvements in ham. In this study, the microbial communities found in ham produced in three distinct regions were compared, revealing that bacteria have a more dominant role in shaping the overall microbiota than fungi. Notably, each type of ham exhibited a unique microbial profile, although those from similar regions shared more similar profiles. Specific bacterial biomarkers were identified for each regional ham: <i>Lactobacillus</i> and <i>Tetragonococcus</i> in Serrano prosciutto, <i>Odoribacter</i>, <i>Alistipes</i>, <i>Staphylococcus</i>, and <i>Akkermansia</i> in Jinhua prosciutto, and <i>Pseudomonas</i>, <i>Blautia</i>, and <i>Bacteroides</i> in Xuanwei prosciutto. The microbial network analysis identified closer associations between microorganisms in the domestically produced Chinese hams than in the Spanish ham, suggesting limited foreign microbial invasions that contributed to a richer, more stable flavor. These findings offer new insights into how microbial interactions shape the development of flavor and quality in ham and clarify future strategies for improving the production process by leveraging microbial communities.
Authors
- Xin Luo (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5827-4563)
- Ying Shen (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8541-6010)
Institutions
- Guizhou Academy of Testing & Analysis (CN)
- Guizhou Academy of Sciences (CN)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Frontiers in Microbiology
- Published
- 2025-03-05
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2025.1531005
- Citations
- 2
- Primary Topic
- Meat and Animal Product Quality
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 2.39