A comparative study on quantitative precipitation estimation based on GPM satellite and X-band phased-array weather radar

This study investigates the performance of the Global Precipitation Measurement (GPM) satellite in comparison to the X-band Phased Array Weather Radar (XPAR) regarding precipitation measurement accuracy, focusing on radar echoes. A comparative analysis was conducted on two significant precipitation events that occurred in 2023 in Xiong’ an New Area, Hebei Province, China, utilizing data from XPAR, GPM, and ground-based observations. The results reveal that XPAR outperforms the GPM satellite in quantitative precipitation estimation, with a correlation coefficient of approximately 0.88 between XPAR data and ground observations, compared to 0.66 for GPM. Furthermore, the root mean square error (RMSE) and mean absolute error (MAE) for XPAR against ground observations were 1.2g mm and 0.64 mm, respectively, while for GPM, these values were significantly higher at 6.98 mm and 1.91 mm. findings highlight the superior capability of XPAR in accurately estimating precipitation, which is crucial for enhancing the detection and early warning of heavy rainfall events.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Frontiers in Remote Sensing
Published
2025-03-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3389/frsen.2025.1546565
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Precipitation Measurement and Analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.30
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A comparative study on quantitative precipitation estimation based on GPM satellite and X-band phased-array weather radar

Yongyan Su, Yan Liu, Wenwen Kong, Bo Zhao et al.
1 citations
Frontiers in Remote Sensing
Precipitation Measurement and Analysis
1.30
article

A comparative study on quantitative precipitation estimation based on GPM satellite and X-band phased-array weather radar

Yongyan Su, Yan Liu, Wenwen Kong, Bo Zhao, Debin Su, Di Wang, Xuejiao Chen
article en
1 citations

Abstract

This study investigates the performance of the Global Precipitation Measurement (GPM) satellite in comparison to the X-band Phased Array Weather Radar (XPAR) regarding precipitation measurement accuracy, focusing on radar echoes. A comparative analysis was conducted on two significant precipitation events that occurred in 2023 in Xiong’ an New Area, Hebei Province, China, utilizing data from XPAR, GPM, and ground-based observations. The results reveal that XPAR outperforms the GPM satellite in quantitative precipitation estimation, with a correlation coefficient of approximately 0.88 between XPAR data and ground observations, compared to 0.66 for GPM. Furthermore, the root mean square error (RMSE) and mean absolute error (MAE) for XPAR against ground observations were 1.2g mm and 0.64 mm, respectively, while for GPM, these values were significantly higher at 6.98 mm and 1.91 mm. findings highlight the superior capability of XPAR in accurately estimating precipitation, which is crucial for enhancing the detection and early warning of heavy rainfall events.

Frontiers in Remote SensingVol. 6
China Meteorological Administration (CN), Sun Yat-sen University (CN), Chengdu University of Information Technology (CN), Hebei Meteorological Bureau (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 26%
Precipitation Measurement and Analysis
1.30
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

A comparative study on quantitative precipitation estimation based on GPM satellite and X-band phased-array weather radar — Yongyan Su, Yan Liu, et al. · Frontiers in Remote Sensing (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS