Proof-of-Work versus Proof-of-Stake: A Comparative Economic Analysis

Abstract We develop an economic model to compare equilibrium security of Proof-of-Work (PoW) versus Proof-of-Stake (PoS) blockchains. We derive general conditions to determine when PoW blockchains are more secure than otherwise equivalent PoS blockchains and vice versa. Applying real-world parameter values to these conditions, we demonstrate that PoS blockchains are more secure than otherwise equivalent PoW blockchains. Furthermore, we demonstrate that PoS’s security advantage over PoW is particularly salient for high-scale blockchains.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Review of Financial Studies
Published
2025-03-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/rfs/hhaf013
Citations
12
Primary Topic
Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
28.18
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Proof-of-Work versus Proof-of-Stake: A Comparative Economic Analysis

Kose John, Thomas J Rivera, Fahad Saleh
12 citations
Review of Financial Studies
Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems
28.18
article

Proof-of-Work versus Proof-of-Stake: A Comparative Economic Analysis

Kose John, Thomas J Rivera, Fahad Saleh
article en
12 citations

Abstract

Abstract We develop an economic model to compare equilibrium security of Proof-of-Work (PoW) versus Proof-of-Stake (PoS) blockchains. We derive general conditions to determine when PoW blockchains are more secure than otherwise equivalent PoS blockchains and vice versa. Applying real-world parameter values to these conditions, we demonstrate that PoS blockchains are more secure than otherwise equivalent PoW blockchains. Furthermore, we demonstrate that PoS’s security advantage over PoW is particularly salient for high-scale blockchains.

Review of Financial StudiesVol. 38(7)
University of Florida (US), McGill University (CA), New York University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 1%
Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems
28.18
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.