Comparative Study of the Quantitative Analysis of Battery Materials with X-ray Nano-tomography: From Ex Situ toward Operando Measurements

Improving battery materials calls for nondestructive techniques capable of delivering high-resolution microstructural information in real time. In this context, X-ray phase contrast nano-tomography is a technique of choice as it enables multiscale 3D characterization. In this study, we propose a feedback loop-integrated workflow for X-ray nano-tomography, based on systematic evaluation of six state-of-the-art battery anode and cathode materials to benchmark key procedures ensuring reliable, reproducible, quality-assessed characterization and subsequent 3D morphological quantification, thus avoiding potential bias in the scientific conclusions. As a result for this phase contrast technique, the sample size and energy used appear as key factors for the final resolution, which enhances imaging capabilities for separating the different material phases of the electrode microstructures. But, it is crucial to adapt these parameters to the materials in order to mitigate errors in the morphological parameter estimation. Moreover, an empirical law based on the heterogeneity and the average particle size distribution has been established to calculate the minimum representative elementary volume to be imaged, showing that volumes of 102 × 102 × 102 μm<sup>3</sup> (50 nm voxel size) are sufficiently representative for the six microstructures studied. Ultimately, guidelines have been established for in situ/<i>operando</i> X-ray nano-tomography measurements, with a proposed/validated in-house setup and cell design that preserve both the image resolution and electrochemistry. A detailed evaluation of the X-ray beam interaction is also presented, exploring the relationship between the dose received by the electrolyte and material and the reliable monitoring of electrochemistry and tomography.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
ACS Nano
Published
2025-03-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1021/acsnano.4c16419
Citations
8
Primary Topic
Electron and X-Ray Spectroscopy Techniques
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
5.29

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparative Study of the Quantitative Analysis of Battery Materials with X-ray Nano-tomography: From Ex Situ toward Operando Measurements

Julie Villanova, Marion Chandesris, Benjamin Holliger, Olga Stamati et al.
8 citations
ACS Nano
Electron and X-Ray Spectroscopy Techniques
5.29
article

Comparative Study of the Quantitative Analysis of Battery Materials with X-ray Nano-tomography: From Ex Situ toward Operando Measurements

Julie Villanova, Marion Chandesris, Benjamin Holliger, Olga Stamati, Sandrine Lyonnard, Rémi Tucoulou, Victor Vanpeene, Cyril Guilloud
article en
8 citations

Abstract

Improving battery materials calls for nondestructive techniques capable of delivering high-resolution microstructural information in real time. In this context, X-ray phase contrast nano-tomography is a technique of choice as it enables multiscale 3D characterization. In this study, we propose a feedback loop-integrated workflow for X-ray nano-tomography, based on systematic evaluation of six state-of-the-art battery anode and cathode materials to benchmark key procedures ensuring reliable, reproducible, quality-assessed characterization and subsequent 3D morphological quantification, thus avoiding potential bias in the scientific conclusions. As a result for this phase contrast technique, the sample size and energy used appear as key factors for the final resolution, which enhances imaging capabilities for separating the different material phases of the electrode microstructures. But, it is crucial to adapt these parameters to the materials in order to mitigate errors in the morphological parameter estimation. Moreover, an empirical law based on the heterogeneity and the average particle size distribution has been established to calculate the minimum representative elementary volume to be imaged, showing that volumes of 102 × 102 × 102 μm<sup>3</sup> (50 nm voxel size) are sufficiently representative for the six microstructures studied. Ultimately, guidelines have been established for in situ/<i>operando</i> X-ray nano-tomography measurements, with a proposed/validated in-house setup and cell design that preserve both the image resolution and electrochemistry. A detailed evaluation of the X-ray beam interaction is also presented, exploring the relationship between the dose received by the electrolyte and material and the reliable monitoring of electrochemistry and tomography.

ACS NanoVol. 19(10)
Institut polytechnique de Grenoble (FR), Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR), Commissariat à l'Énergie Atomique et aux Énergies Alternatives (FR), European Synchrotron Radiation Facility (FR), Laboratoire d’Innovation pour les Technologies des Énergies Nouvelles et les nanomatériaux (FR), CEA Grenoble (FR), Université Grenoble Alpes (FR)
H2020 Future and Emerging Technologies, H2020 LEIT Advanced Materials
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Electron and X-Ray Spectroscopy Techniques
5.29
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.