Biodiversity credits: a new currency to support nature conservation?

Abstract Biodiversity credits are increasingly being promoted as an innovative tool for closing the biodiversity finance gap. A growing number of providers are offering biodiversity credits, either linked to carbon credits or as a new asset class in their own right. However, there are also warnings that they could become a double-edged sword for conservation and distract governments from their financial responsibilities agreed in the Global Biodiversity Framework. Biodiversity credits differ from other environmental policy instruments in that they offer a non-offsetting way of financing conservation and restoration activities. Well-designed credit schemes can therefore make a significant contribution to real net biodiversity gains. But to realize their full potential, biodiversity credits need to be based on a common methodology, broaden their focus to include marine areas, and respect the rights of local and Indigenous communities. Benefit sharing and embedding in regulatory approaches will be critical to their success.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Oryx
Published
2025-03-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1017/s0030605324001467
Citations
8
Primary Topic
Environmental Conservation and Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
19.38
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Biodiversity credits: a new currency to support nature conservation?

Julian Clifton, Kathleen Schwerdtner Máñez
8 citations
Oryx
Environmental Conservation and Management
19.38
article

Biodiversity credits: a new currency to support nature conservation?

Julian Clifton, Kathleen Schwerdtner Máñez
article en
8 citations

Abstract

Abstract Biodiversity credits are increasingly being promoted as an innovative tool for closing the biodiversity finance gap. A growing number of providers are offering biodiversity credits, either linked to carbon credits or as a new asset class in their own right. However, there are also warnings that they could become a double-edged sword for conservation and distract governments from their financial responsibilities agreed in the Global Biodiversity Framework. Biodiversity credits differ from other environmental policy instruments in that they offer a non-offsetting way of financing conservation and restoration activities. Well-designed credit schemes can therefore make a significant contribution to real net biodiversity gains. But to realize their full potential, biodiversity credits need to be based on a common methodology, broaden their focus to include marine areas, and respect the rights of local and Indigenous communities. Benefit sharing and embedding in regulatory approaches will be critical to their success.

OryxVol. 59(3)
Curtin University (AU), Leibniz Institute for Baltic Sea Research Warnemünde (DE), Universität Greifswald (DE), V. B. Sochava Institute of Geography (RU)
Openalex Percentile: Top 1%
Environmental Conservation and Management
19.38
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Biodiversity credits: a new currency to support nature conservation? — Julian Clifton, Kathleen Schwerdtner Máñez · Oryx (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS