LLM-generated tips rival expert-created tips in helping students answer quantum-computing questions

Abstract Alleviating high workloads for teachers is crucial for continuous high quality education. To evaluate if Large Language Models (LLMs) can alleviate this problem in the quantum computing domain, we conducted two complementary studies exploring the use of GPT-4 to automatically generate tips for students. (1) A between-subject survey in which students (N = 46) solved four multiple-choice quantum computing questions with either the help of expert-created or LLMgenerated tips. To correct for possible biases, we additionally introduced two deception conditions. (2) Experienced educators and students (N = 23) directly compared the LLM-generated and expert-created tips. Our results show that the LLM-generated tips were significantly more helpful and pointed better towards relevant concepts while also giving away more of the answers. Furthermore, we found that participants in the first study performed significantly better in answering the quantum computing questions when given tips labeled as LLM-generated, even if they were expert-created. This points towards a placebo effect induced by the participants’ biases for LLM-generated content. Ultimately, we contribute that LLM-generated tips can be used instead of expert tips to support teaching of quantum computing basics.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
EPJ Quantum Technology
Published
2025-03-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1140/epjqt/s40507-025-00334-5
Citations
5
Primary Topic
Teaching and Learning Programming
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
8.47

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

LLM-generated tips rival expert-created tips in helping students answer quantum-computing questions

Maximilian Kiefer-Emmanouilidis, Herwig Ott, Ali Moghiseh, Jakob Karolus et al.
5 citations
EPJ Quantum Technology
Teaching and Learning Programming
8.47
article

LLM-generated tips rival expert-created tips in helping students answer quantum-computing questions

Maximilian Kiefer-Emmanouilidis, Herwig Ott, Ali Moghiseh, Jakob Karolus, Sungho Suh, Artur Widera, Lars Krupp, Jonas Bley, Alexander Geng, Isacco Gobbi, Arcesio Castaneda Medina, Sabine Müller, Paul Lukowicz, Valeria Bartsch
article en
5 citations

Abstract

Abstract Alleviating high workloads for teachers is crucial for continuous high quality education. To evaluate if Large Language Models (LLMs) can alleviate this problem in the quantum computing domain, we conducted two complementary studies exploring the use of GPT-4 to automatically generate tips for students. (1) A between-subject survey in which students (N = 46) solved four multiple-choice quantum computing questions with either the help of expert-created or LLMgenerated tips. To correct for possible biases, we additionally introduced two deception conditions. (2) Experienced educators and students (N = 23) directly compared the LLM-generated and expert-created tips. Our results show that the LLM-generated tips were significantly more helpful and pointed better towards relevant concepts while also giving away more of the answers. Furthermore, we found that participants in the first study performed significantly better in answering the quantum computing questions when given tips labeled as LLM-generated, even if they were expert-created. This points towards a placebo effect induced by the participants’ biases for LLM-generated content. Ultimately, we contribute that LLM-generated tips can be used instead of expert tips to support teaching of quantum computing basics.

EPJ Quantum TechnologyVol. 12(1)
University of Kaiserslautern (DE), Fraunhofer Institute for Industrial Mathematics (DE), German Research Centre for Artificial Intelligence (DE), Fraunhofer Center for Maritime Logistics and Services (DE), University of Applied Sciences Kaiserslautern (DE)
Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Teaching and Learning Programming
8.47
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.