Analysis of Phosphorus Soil Sorption Data: Improved Results from Global Least-Squares Fitting

Phosphate sorption data are often analyzed by least-squares fitting to the two- or three-parameter Freundlich model. The standard methods are flawed by (1) treating the measured pseudo-equilibrium concentration C as the independent (hence error-free) variable and (2) neglecting the weighting that should accommodate the varying precision of the data. Here, we address both of these shortfalls and use a global fit model to achieve optimal precision in fitting data for five acidic Australian soil types. Each individual dataset consists of measured C values for up to nine phosphate spiking levels C0. For each soil type, there are three–five such datasets from varying levels of phosphate fertilizer pre-exposure (Pf) two years earlier. These datasets are fitted simultaneously by expressing the Freundlich capacity factor a and exponent b as theoretically predicted functions of the assay amounts of Fe, Al, and P measured for each Pf. The analysis allows for uncertainty in both C and C0, with inverse-variance weighting from variance functions estimated by residuals analysis. The estimated presorbed P amounts Q depend linearly on Pf, with positive intercepts at Pf = 0, indicating residual phosphate in the soils prior to the laboratory phosphate treatments. The key takeaway points are as follows: (1) global analysis yields optimal estimates and improved precision for the fit parameters; (2) allowing for uncertainty in C is essential when the data include C values near 0; (3) varying data precision requires weighting to yield optimal parameter estimates and reliable uncertainties.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Soil Systems
Published
2025-03-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/soilsystems9010022
Citations
4
Primary Topic
Soil Geostatistics and Mapping
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.20
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Analysis of Phosphorus Soil Sorption Data: Improved Results from Global Least-Squares Fitting

Paul Holford, Joel Tellinghuisen, Paul J. Milham
4 citations
Soil Systems
Soil Geostatistics and Mapping
3.20
article

Analysis of Phosphorus Soil Sorption Data: Improved Results from Global Least-Squares Fitting

Paul Holford, Joel Tellinghuisen, Paul J. Milham
article en
4 citations

Abstract

Phosphate sorption data are often analyzed by least-squares fitting to the two- or three-parameter Freundlich model. The standard methods are flawed by (1) treating the measured pseudo-equilibrium concentration C as the independent (hence error-free) variable and (2) neglecting the weighting that should accommodate the varying precision of the data. Here, we address both of these shortfalls and use a global fit model to achieve optimal precision in fitting data for five acidic Australian soil types. Each individual dataset consists of measured C values for up to nine phosphate spiking levels C0. For each soil type, there are three–five such datasets from varying levels of phosphate fertilizer pre-exposure (Pf) two years earlier. These datasets are fitted simultaneously by expressing the Freundlich capacity factor a and exponent b as theoretically predicted functions of the assay amounts of Fe, Al, and P measured for each Pf. The analysis allows for uncertainty in both C and C0, with inverse-variance weighting from variance functions estimated by residuals analysis. The estimated presorbed P amounts Q depend linearly on Pf, with positive intercepts at Pf = 0, indicating residual phosphate in the soils prior to the laboratory phosphate treatments. The key takeaway points are as follows: (1) global analysis yields optimal estimates and improved precision for the fit parameters; (2) allowing for uncertainty in C is essential when the data include C values near 0; (3) varying data precision requires weighting to yield optimal parameter estimates and reliable uncertainties.

Soil SystemsVol. 9(1)
Vanderbilt University (US), Western Sydney University (AU)
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Soil Geostatistics and Mapping
3.20
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.