Assessing airline communication for voluntary carbon offsets

Airlines offer voluntary carbon offsetting (VCO) programmes in response to growing climate action demands. However, these programmes face scrutiny over potential greenwashing in communication. This study uses a two-step approach to examine the communication practices of 32 airlines across Asia, Europe, and North America. The content analysis assesses accessibility, transparency, and flexibility in communications, focusing on emphasizing not just the content but also how easily travellers can find, understand, and engage with VCO information. The interpretive analysis identifies misleading practices. Findings reveal diverse practices, regional variations, and differing transparency levels. While some airlines provide detailed communication, others use misleading tactics such as vagueness and selective disclosure. Notably, a third of the airlines did not offer VCO programmes, with many shifting towards sustainable aviation fuels. The results underscore the need for standardized regulations for VCO communication to enable travellers to make informed decisions in the evolving landscape of airline environmental responsibility.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
npj Sustainable Mobility and Transport
Published
2025-03-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s44333-025-00027-7
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Advanced Aircraft Design and Technologies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.11
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Assessing airline communication for voluntary carbon offsets

J. Liu, Bonnie Heung Ng Tsoi
1 citations
npj Sustainable Mobility and Transport
Advanced Aircraft Design and Technologies
1.11
article

Assessing airline communication for voluntary carbon offsets

J. Liu, Bonnie Heung Ng Tsoi
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Airlines offer voluntary carbon offsetting (VCO) programmes in response to growing climate action demands. However, these programmes face scrutiny over potential greenwashing in communication. This study uses a two-step approach to examine the communication practices of 32 airlines across Asia, Europe, and North America. The content analysis assesses accessibility, transparency, and flexibility in communications, focusing on emphasizing not just the content but also how easily travellers can find, understand, and engage with VCO information. The interpretive analysis identifies misleading practices. Findings reveal diverse practices, regional variations, and differing transparency levels. While some airlines provide detailed communication, others use misleading tactics such as vagueness and selective disclosure. Notably, a third of the airlines did not offer VCO programmes, with many shifting towards sustainable aviation fuels. The results underscore the need for standardized regulations for VCO communication to enable travellers to make informed decisions in the evolving landscape of airline environmental responsibility.

npj Sustainable Mobility and TransportVol. 2(1)
National Taiwan University (TW)
Openalex Percentile: Top 27%
Advanced Aircraft Design and Technologies
1.11
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Assessing airline communication for voluntary carbon offsets — J. Liu, Bonnie Heung Ng Tsoi · npj Sustainable Mobility and Transport (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS