Communication and resolution programs expose hard-to-hear truths

Communication and Resolution Programs' (CRP) favorable impact on professional liability claims continues to draw attention, but because they are deliberately aligned to advance the health system's mission rather than amelioration of litigation exposure, CRPs stand a better chance of delivering durable healthcare improvements than traditional responses to patient harm. CRP adherents employ focused investigations overseen by their own patient safety leader in order to engage patients with a principled response following unintended clinical outcomes. Focused on safety and unencumbered by litigation delays, CRP investigations are more apt than traditional responses to lay bare patient safety risks including professionalism challenges. Leaders, however, must be prepared to embrace and address hard-to-hear truths about dysfunctional systems or disruptive humans that threaten outcomes of care or clinical staff wellbeing.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Frontiers in Health Services
Published
2025-03-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3389/frhs.2024.1523363
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Medical Malpractice and Liability Issues
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.02
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Communication and resolution programs expose hard-to-hear truths

Richard C. Boothman, Róbert E. Wyatt, Gerald B. Hickson, Alice M. Krumm
1 citations
Frontiers in Health Services
Medical Malpractice and Liability Issues
2.02
article

Communication and resolution programs expose hard-to-hear truths

Richard C. Boothman, Róbert E. Wyatt, Gerald B. Hickson, Alice M. Krumm
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Communication and Resolution Programs' (CRP) favorable impact on professional liability claims continues to draw attention, but because they are deliberately aligned to advance the health system's mission rather than amelioration of litigation exposure, CRPs stand a better chance of delivering durable healthcare improvements than traditional responses to patient harm. CRP adherents employ focused investigations overseen by their own patient safety leader in order to engage patients with a principled response following unintended clinical outcomes. Focused on safety and unencumbered by litigation delays, CRP investigations are more apt than traditional responses to lay bare patient safety risks including professionalism challenges. Leaders, however, must be prepared to embrace and address hard-to-hear truths about dysfunctional systems or disruptive humans that threaten outcomes of care or clinical staff wellbeing.

Frontiers in Health ServicesVol. 4
University of Michigan (US), Vanderbilt University Medical Center (US)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 14%
Medical Malpractice and Liability Issues
2.02
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.