Anthropometric measures to evaluate sex and stature from foot dimensions in a population of North-west India

Skeletonized, highly decomposed and commingled remains of the foot are often recovered from mass disaster scenes. Examining foot evidence can help understand human variation and assist investigative agencies in solving medico-legal cases. The present cross-sectional study was conducted to estimate sex and stature from various foot dimensions. Seven dimensions of foot considered for the study include 5 Toe lengths (FDT1-FDT5), Ball breadth (FDBB), and Heel breadth (FDHB). A total of 410 bilateral feet (205 individuals) were measured in the present study, out of which 128 were males and 77 were females. Results inferred left feet to be significantly larger than right feet for both sexes. The cut-off scores for male and female centroids were counted at -0.351, with a cross-validated value 86.7% for males and 89.6% for females in predicting group memberships for sex estimation. The correlation coefficient was found to be significantly higher in the pooled sample (.572** to .710**), in comparison to males (.201** to .526**) and females (.220** to .551**) separately. Significantly highest R2 and S.E.E. values (p < 0.001) were observed for bilateral FDT2 in both sexes. Subsequently, population-specific models were obtained by formulating linear regression formulae to estimate stature. Results were inferred to be applicable in the population similar to the present study’s sample, and the database can contribute to ergonomics, medico-legal and forensic investigations.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
European Journal of Anatomy
Published
2025-03-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.52083/ujqe5909
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Body Composition Measurement Techniques
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.16
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Anthropometric measures to evaluate sex and stature from foot dimensions in a population of North-west India

Nandini Chitara, Rakesh Meena, Kewal Krishan, Ankita Guleria et al.
1 citations
European Journal of Anatomy
Body Composition Measurement Techniques
1.16
article

Anthropometric measures to evaluate sex and stature from foot dimensions in a population of North-west India

Nandini Chitara, Rakesh Meena, Kewal Krishan, Ankita Guleria, Devi Das, Ramesh Sahani, Saumya Seal, Sreeparna Pal
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Skeletonized, highly decomposed and commingled remains of the foot are often recovered from mass disaster scenes. Examining foot evidence can help understand human variation and assist investigative agencies in solving medico-legal cases. The present cross-sectional study was conducted to estimate sex and stature from various foot dimensions. Seven dimensions of foot considered for the study include 5 Toe lengths (FDT1-FDT5), Ball breadth (FDBB), and Heel breadth (FDHB). A total of 410 bilateral feet (205 individuals) were measured in the present study, out of which 128 were males and 77 were females. Results inferred left feet to be significantly larger than right feet for both sexes. The cut-off scores for male and female centroids were counted at -0.351, with a cross-validated value 86.7% for males and 89.6% for females in predicting group memberships for sex estimation. The correlation coefficient was found to be significantly higher in the pooled sample (.572** to .710**), in comparison to males (.201** to .526**) and females (.220** to .551**) separately. Significantly highest R2 and S.E.E. values (p < 0.001) were observed for bilateral FDT2 in both sexes. Subsequently, population-specific models were obtained by formulating linear regression formulae to estimate stature. Results were inferred to be applicable in the population similar to the present study’s sample, and the database can contribute to ergonomics, medico-legal and forensic investigations.

European Journal of AnatomyVol. 29(2)
Openalex Percentile: Top 25%
Body Composition Measurement Techniques
1.16
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.