Evaluating base and retrieval augmented LLMs with document or online support for evidence based neurology
Effectively managing evidence-based information is increasingly challenging. This study tested large language models (LLMs), including document- and online-enabled retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) systems, using 13 recent neurology guidelines across 130 questions. Results showed substantial variability. RAG improved accuracy compared to base models but still produced potentially harmful answers. RAG-based systems performed worse on case-based than knowledge-based questions. Further refinement and improved regulation is needed for safe clinical integration of RAG-enhanced LLMs.
Authors
- Sven Guenther Meuth (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2571-3501)
- Lars Masanneck (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2496-1415)
- Marc Pawlitzki (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3080-2277)
Institutions
- Düsseldorf University Hospital (DE)
- Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf (DE)
Publication Details
- Journal
- npj Digital Medicine
- Published
- 2025-03-04
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1038/s41746-025-01536-y
- Citations
- 26
- Primary Topic
- Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 17.01
Funders
- Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft