Principles of good practice for translation of electronic clinical outcome assessments
The recommendations fall into two main categories: namely, operational and scientific. The operational recommendations consist of active involvement from all stakeholders, the communication of clear expectations from the start, and better clarification of timelines of LSPs involved. Examples of scientific recommendations are electronic language feasibility assessment (ELFA), screenshot proofreading, as well as COA-specific developer and copyright holder guidelines for electronic implementation. COA-specific guidelines and instructions for electronic implementation and evaluation were seen to be needed and key recommendations are discussed in detail in this paper.
Authors
- E. Parks-Vernizzi
- C Anfray
- Sonya Eremenco (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3956-0235)
- John Eric Chaplin (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8128-4225)
- Holger Muehlan (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8048-5682)
- Huda Shalhoub (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0230-0149)
- Dagmara Kuliś (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2289-2113)
- Jussi P. Repo (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4688-5698)
- Mark Turner (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2089-5978)
- Benjamin Arnold (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7591-2539)
- A. Bradley-Gilbride
Institutions
- Bayer (United States) (US)
- University of Erfurt (DE)
- Critical Path Institute (US)
- Mapi Research Trust (FR)
- GlaxoSmithKline (United States) (US)
- European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (BE)
- Tampere University Hospital (FI)
- Tampere University (FI)
- Bayer (Germany) (DE)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Journal of Patient-Reported Outcomes
- Published
- 2025-03-04
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1186/s41687-025-00859-4
- Citations
- 1
- Primary Topic
- Clinical practice guidelines implementation
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 1.88