Second-Order Urban Agglomerations in the Moscow Region: Development Trends in the Post-Soviet Period

In this article, based on data from mobile operators on the current flows of labor commuters, a delimitation of second-order urban agglomerations in the Moscow region was carried out using a graph-analytical approach that has not previously been used to study settlement systems. The authors’ methodology included the construction of a series of graphs and their processing using the Leiden clustering algorithm (with and without taking into account the influence of Moscow) with subsequent identification of second-order agglomerations from the resulting clusters. Twenty five small agglomerations were identified, 16 of which emerged during the Soviet period. During the post-socialist transformation of social and economic life, the large-scale inflow of migrants and mass housing construction in the area of near and middle suburbs of the capital’s agglomeration, a dynamic and multi-core frontier belt was formed, in which new (Vidnoe, Chekhov and Naro-Fominsk) urban second-order agglomerations appeared and many previously existing (Lyuberty–Ramenskoye, Khimki–Zelenograd and Mytishchi–Korolyov–Shchyolkovo) were segmented. In them, the rapid growth of cores occurred both as a result of migration growth and due to the inclusion of satellite settlements into their composition through administrative–territorial transformations. In turn, many cities that were not absorbed grew and formed new cores, laying the foundation for the further division of small agglomerations (for example, Lyubertsy). In the agglomerations located on the periphery, the overwhelming majority of which were formed during the Soviet era, only in recent years has the population in the cores stopped decreasing. Against this background, the role of large rural settlements and urban-type settlements has noticeably increased, currently forming the spatial framework of suburban areas of most agglomerations. Thus, the conducted analysis not only allowed us to identify the development trends of small agglomerations—this underestimated tier of the settlement system, but also laid the theoretical basis for the practical implementation of the principles of polycentric spatial development of the Moscow agglomeration.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Regional Research of Russia
Published
2024-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1134/s2079970524600641
Primary Topic
Regional Socio-Economic Development Trends
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Second-Order Urban Agglomerations in the Moscow Region: Development Trends in the Post-Soviet Period

А. Г. Махрова, R. А. Babkin, Alexander Bereznyatsky
Regional Research of Russia
Regional Socio-Economic Development Trends
article

Second-Order Urban Agglomerations in the Moscow Region: Development Trends in the Post-Soviet Period

А. Г. Махрова, R. А. Babkin, Alexander Bereznyatsky
article en

Abstract

In this article, based on data from mobile operators on the current flows of labor commuters, a delimitation of second-order urban agglomerations in the Moscow region was carried out using a graph-analytical approach that has not previously been used to study settlement systems. The authors’ methodology included the construction of a series of graphs and their processing using the Leiden clustering algorithm (with and without taking into account the influence of Moscow) with subsequent identification of second-order agglomerations from the resulting clusters. Twenty five small agglomerations were identified, 16 of which emerged during the Soviet period. During the post-socialist transformation of social and economic life, the large-scale inflow of migrants and mass housing construction in the area of near and middle suburbs of the capital’s agglomeration, a dynamic and multi-core frontier belt was formed, in which new (Vidnoe, Chekhov and Naro-Fominsk) urban second-order agglomerations appeared and many previously existing (Lyuberty–Ramenskoye, Khimki–Zelenograd and Mytishchi–Korolyov–Shchyolkovo) were segmented. In them, the rapid growth of cores occurred both as a result of migration growth and due to the inclusion of satellite settlements into their composition through administrative–territorial transformations. In turn, many cities that were not absorbed grew and formed new cores, laying the foundation for the further division of small agglomerations (for example, Lyubertsy). In the agglomerations located on the periphery, the overwhelming majority of which were formed during the Soviet era, only in recent years has the population in the cores stopped decreasing. Against this background, the role of large rural settlements and urban-type settlements has noticeably increased, currently forming the spatial framework of suburban areas of most agglomerations. Thus, the conducted analysis not only allowed us to identify the development trends of small agglomerations—this underestimated tier of the settlement system, but also laid the theoretical basis for the practical implementation of the principles of polycentric spatial development of the Moscow agglomeration.

Regional Research of RussiaVol. 14(S1)
Plekhanov Russian University of Economics (RU), Lomonosov Moscow State University (RU), Central Economics and Mathematics Institute (RU), Ministry of Internal Affairs of the Russian Federation (RU)
Sustainable cities and communities
Openalex Percentile: Top 46%
Regional Socio-Economic Development Trends
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.