HF-Ultrasonography to Quantify Skin Atrophy in Patients with Inflammatory Rheumatic Diseases Treated with Courses of Glucocorticoids

<b>Background</b>: Prolonged courses of glucocorticoids (GCs) for patients suffering from inflammatory rheumatic diseases (IRDs) are associated with adverse effects. High-frequency ultrasonography (HFUS) has been utilized to quantify skin changes during short-term topical GC treatment. We aimed to quantify skin atrophy in IRD patients treated systemically with prolonged courses of GCs. <b>Methods</b>: We performed a cross-sectional study comparing patients with IRDs and GC treatment who presented with clinically evident skin atrophy to a matched cohort (1:1) without IRDs and GC treatment. Skinfold measurements, utilizing a standardized caliper, and B-mode HFUS images, utilizing an 18 MHz linear sonography probe, were acquired at back-of-hand, cubital, and dorsal midfoot regions and then compared between both groups. <b>Results</b>: A total of 53 GC-treated IRD patients (33 (62%) women, mean age 66.4 (±10.0) years, GC treatment median 8.0 (1.0-47.0) years) were compared to 53 subjects without IRDs and GC treatment (32 (60%) women, 65.9 (±11.3) years). Skinfold thickness measured at the back of hands [1.7 (±0.4) vs. 2.1 (±0.5) mm, <i>p</i> < 0.001], but not at the cubital [6.7 (±2.7) vs. 7.1 (±3.0) mm] or dorsal midfoot [3.6 (±3.7) vs. 4.1 (±3.4) mm] areas, showed a significant difference between the groups. In comparison, all areas displayed statistically significant different cutaneous thickness in the evaluation by HFUS: hand 0.66 (±0.12) vs. 0.82 (±0.18), <i>p</i> < 0.001; cubital 0.86 (±0.15) vs. 1.00 (±0.21), <i>p</i> < 0.001; and midfoot 0.76 (±0.16) vs. 0.94 (±0.18), <i>p</i> < 0.001. <b>Conclusions</b>: This study revealed significantly lower values in the measured cutaneous thickness by HFUS for GC-treated patients with IRDs compared to persons without IRD and GC treatment.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Diagnostics
Published
2025-03-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics15050619
Primary Topic
Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

HF-Ultrasonography to Quantify Skin Atrophy in Patients with Inflammatory Rheumatic Diseases Treated with Courses of Glucocorticoids

Boris P. Ehrenstein, Florian Günther, Martin Fleck, Andreas Horn et al.
Diagnostics
Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Research
article

HF-Ultrasonography to Quantify Skin Atrophy in Patients with Inflammatory Rheumatic Diseases Treated with Courses of Glucocorticoids

Boris P. Ehrenstein, Florian Günther, Martin Fleck, Andreas Horn, Wolfgang Hartung, Antonia Schuster
article en

Abstract

<b>Background</b>: Prolonged courses of glucocorticoids (GCs) for patients suffering from inflammatory rheumatic diseases (IRDs) are associated with adverse effects. High-frequency ultrasonography (HFUS) has been utilized to quantify skin changes during short-term topical GC treatment. We aimed to quantify skin atrophy in IRD patients treated systemically with prolonged courses of GCs. <b>Methods</b>: We performed a cross-sectional study comparing patients with IRDs and GC treatment who presented with clinically evident skin atrophy to a matched cohort (1:1) without IRDs and GC treatment. Skinfold measurements, utilizing a standardized caliper, and B-mode HFUS images, utilizing an 18 MHz linear sonography probe, were acquired at back-of-hand, cubital, and dorsal midfoot regions and then compared between both groups. <b>Results</b>: A total of 53 GC-treated IRD patients (33 (62%) women, mean age 66.4 (±10.0) years, GC treatment median 8.0 (1.0-47.0) years) were compared to 53 subjects without IRDs and GC treatment (32 (60%) women, 65.9 (±11.3) years). Skinfold thickness measured at the back of hands [1.7 (±0.4) vs. 2.1 (±0.5) mm, <i>p</i> < 0.001], but not at the cubital [6.7 (±2.7) vs. 7.1 (±3.0) mm] or dorsal midfoot [3.6 (±3.7) vs. 4.1 (±3.4) mm] areas, showed a significant difference between the groups. In comparison, all areas displayed statistically significant different cutaneous thickness in the evaluation by HFUS: hand 0.66 (±0.12) vs. 0.82 (±0.18), <i>p</i> < 0.001; cubital 0.86 (±0.15) vs. 1.00 (±0.21), <i>p</i> < 0.001; and midfoot 0.76 (±0.16) vs. 0.94 (±0.18), <i>p</i> < 0.001. <b>Conclusions</b>: This study revealed significantly lower values in the measured cutaneous thickness by HFUS for GC-treated patients with IRDs compared to persons without IRD and GC treatment.

DiagnosticsVol. 15(5)
University Hospital Regensburg (DE), Asklepios Kliniken Bad Abbach (DE), University of Regensburg (DE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 94%
Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.