Stability of Classical Shadows under Gate-Dependent Noise

Expectation values of observables are routinely estimated using so-called classical shadows-the outcomes of randomized bases measurements on a repeatedly prepared quantum state. In order to trust the accuracy of shadow estimation in practice, it is crucial to understand the behavior of the estimators under realistic noise. In this Letter, we prove that any shadow estimation protocol involving Clifford unitaries is stable under gate-dependent noise for observables with bounded stabilizer norm-originally introduced in the context of simulating Clifford circuits. In contrast, we demonstrate with concrete examples that estimation of "magic" observables can lead to highly misleading results in the presence of miscalibration errors and a worst case bias scaling exponentially in the system size. We further find that so-called robust shadows, aiming at mitigating noise, can introduce a large bias in the presence of gate-dependent noise compared to unmitigated classical shadows. Nevertheless, we guarantee the functioning of robust shadows for a more general noise setting than in previous works. On a technical level, we identify average noise channels that affect shadow estimators and allow for a more fine-grained control of noise-induced biases.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Physical Review Letters
Published
2025-03-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevlett.134.090801
Citations
6
Primary Topic
Quantum Information and Cryptography
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
14.89

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Stability of Classical Shadows under Gate-Dependent Noise

Raphael Brieger, Martin Kliesch, Markus Heinrich, Ingo Roth
6 citations
Physical Review Letters
Quantum Information and Cryptography
14.89
article

Stability of Classical Shadows under Gate-Dependent Noise

Raphael Brieger, Martin Kliesch, Markus Heinrich, Ingo Roth
article en
6 citations

Abstract

Expectation values of observables are routinely estimated using so-called classical shadows-the outcomes of randomized bases measurements on a repeatedly prepared quantum state. In order to trust the accuracy of shadow estimation in practice, it is crucial to understand the behavior of the estimators under realistic noise. In this Letter, we prove that any shadow estimation protocol involving Clifford unitaries is stable under gate-dependent noise for observables with bounded stabilizer norm-originally introduced in the context of simulating Clifford circuits. In contrast, we demonstrate with concrete examples that estimation of "magic" observables can lead to highly misleading results in the presence of miscalibration errors and a worst case bias scaling exponentially in the system size. We further find that so-called robust shadows, aiming at mitigating noise, can introduce a large bias in the presence of gate-dependent noise compared to unmitigated classical shadows. Nevertheless, we guarantee the functioning of robust shadows for a more general noise setting than in previous works. On a technical level, we identify average noise channels that affect shadow estimators and allow for a more fine-grained control of noise-induced biases.

Physical Review LettersVol. 134(9)
Universität Hamburg (DE), Technology Innovation Institute (AE), Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf (DE), Hamburg University of Technology (DE)
Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft, Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung, Fujitsu
Openalex Percentile: Top 1%
Quantum Information and Cryptography
14.89
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.