Challenges and opportunities in leveraging an existing systematic evidence database for mitigating hazards to the global food system

The global food system, essential for delivering nutritional security to a growing population, is highly vulnerable to diverse hazards. This study investigates the feasibility of leveraging an existing systematic database, specifically the Conservation Evidence database, for mitigating environmental hazards impacting the food system. By focusing on human-wildlife conflict as a case study, we explored the database's potential to inform hazard mitigation strategies. Our analysis revealed significant geographical and taxonomic gaps, varied intervention strategies and differences in study designs across regions. We identified key challenges, such as the need for comprehensive tagging and filtering features, integration of non-academic data and broader stakeholder engagement. The findings underscore the complexity of adapting conservation databases for food system applications but highlight the potential benefits of a free-to-access, systematic, evidence-based approach focusing on food production hazard mitigation. Future work should focus on developing a dedicated food system hazard database, leveraging automation and machine learning to enhance data extraction and application efficacy, ultimately improving global food security and sustainability.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Royal Society Open Science
Published
2025-03-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1098/rsos.241645
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Zoonotic diseases and public health
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.88
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Challenges and opportunities in leveraging an existing systematic evidence database for mitigating hazards to the global food system

Julie Bremner, Silviu O. Petrovan, Samuel W. Short, David C. Aldridge et al.
1 citations
Royal Society Open Science
Zoonotic diseases and public health
1.88
article

Challenges and opportunities in leveraging an existing systematic evidence database for mitigating hazards to the global food system

Julie Bremner, Silviu O. Petrovan, Samuel W. Short, David C. Aldridge, David F. Willer, William J. Sutherland, Diana Khripko
article en
1 citations

Abstract

The global food system, essential for delivering nutritional security to a growing population, is highly vulnerable to diverse hazards. This study investigates the feasibility of leveraging an existing systematic database, specifically the Conservation Evidence database, for mitigating environmental hazards impacting the food system. By focusing on human-wildlife conflict as a case study, we explored the database's potential to inform hazard mitigation strategies. Our analysis revealed significant geographical and taxonomic gaps, varied intervention strategies and differences in study designs across regions. We identified key challenges, such as the need for comprehensive tagging and filtering features, integration of non-academic data and broader stakeholder engagement. The findings underscore the complexity of adapting conservation databases for food system applications but highlight the potential benefits of a free-to-access, systematic, evidence-based approach focusing on food production hazard mitigation. Future work should focus on developing a dedicated food system hazard database, leveraging automation and machine learning to enhance data extraction and application efficacy, ultimately improving global food security and sustainability.

Royal Society Open ScienceVol. 12(3)
University of East Anglia (GB), Centre for Environment, Fisheries and Aquaculture Science (GB), University of Cambridge (GB), Norwich Research Park (GB), Conservation Leadership Programme (GB)
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 18%
Zoonotic diseases and public health
1.88
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.