Surface fatigue in lubricated contacts: Mapping the failure modes of micropitting versus macropitting

• Failure mode maps identifying conditions causing micropitting vs macropitting. • Higher Hertz pressure favours macropitting, higher roughness favours micropitting. • Λ ratio has a comparatively weaker influence on type of failure mode. • Higher R q and lower Λ increase severity of micropitting and shorten its incubation. • Transition of initial micropitting to eventual macropitting promoted by higher pressure but prevented by severe micropitting rate. This paper presents a surface-fatigue failure mode map to identify contact conditions which preferentially lead to (i) micropitting, (ii) initial micropitting transitioning to surface-initiated macropitting, and (iii) surface-initiated macropitting only failure modes in lubricated rolling-sliding contacts representative of rolling bearings and gears. The study used a triple disc fatigue rig to systematically investigate the effect of contact pressure, surface roughness and Λ-ratio on the type of surface fatigue damage mode. Specimens made of case-carburised 16MnCr5 steel and a custom-blended PAO + ZDDP oil were used. Results show that higher Hertz contact pressures strongly favour the occurrence of macropitting over micropitting; In present tests no macropitting was detected in any tests at Hertz pressures less than 1.5 GPa. Conversely, lower pressures favour micropitting. This is likely due to higher macro-pressure being able to drive the surface-initiated cracks deeper into the subsurface material, which was shown to be a pre-requisite for formation of macropits. Higher roughness favours micropitting due to higher asperity stresses, while the influence of Λ-ratio on failure mode is relatively weak as long as contact is within mixed/boundary lubrication regime. Higher roughness and lower Λ increased the severity of micropitting. Transition of initial micropitting to a more damaging macropitting mode is promoted by higher Hertz pressures but can be prevented by more severe rates of micropitting wear as caused by higher roughness and lower Λ-ratio. Given the different implications of micropitting versus macropitting, the presented failure mode map can be used during the design process to help improve the reliability of relevant machines.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Fatigue
Published
2025-03-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2025.108908
Citations
5
Primary Topic
Adhesion, Friction, and Surface Interactions
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.32
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Surface fatigue in lubricated contacts: Mapping the failure modes of micropitting versus macropitting

B. Wainwright, Amir Kadiric
5 citations
International Journal of Fatigue
Adhesion, Friction, and Surface Interactions
4.32
article

Surface fatigue in lubricated contacts: Mapping the failure modes of micropitting versus macropitting

B. Wainwright, Amir Kadiric
article en
5 citations

Abstract

• Failure mode maps identifying conditions causing micropitting vs macropitting. • Higher Hertz pressure favours macropitting, higher roughness favours micropitting. • Λ ratio has a comparatively weaker influence on type of failure mode. • Higher R q and lower Λ increase severity of micropitting and shorten its incubation. • Transition of initial micropitting to eventual macropitting promoted by higher pressure but prevented by severe micropitting rate. This paper presents a surface-fatigue failure mode map to identify contact conditions which preferentially lead to (i) micropitting, (ii) initial micropitting transitioning to surface-initiated macropitting, and (iii) surface-initiated macropitting only failure modes in lubricated rolling-sliding contacts representative of rolling bearings and gears. The study used a triple disc fatigue rig to systematically investigate the effect of contact pressure, surface roughness and Λ-ratio on the type of surface fatigue damage mode. Specimens made of case-carburised 16MnCr5 steel and a custom-blended PAO + ZDDP oil were used. Results show that higher Hertz contact pressures strongly favour the occurrence of macropitting over micropitting; In present tests no macropitting was detected in any tests at Hertz pressures less than 1.5 GPa. Conversely, lower pressures favour micropitting. This is likely due to higher macro-pressure being able to drive the surface-initiated cracks deeper into the subsurface material, which was shown to be a pre-requisite for formation of macropits. Higher roughness favours micropitting due to higher asperity stresses, while the influence of Λ-ratio on failure mode is relatively weak as long as contact is within mixed/boundary lubrication regime. Higher roughness and lower Λ increased the severity of micropitting. Transition of initial micropitting to a more damaging macropitting mode is promoted by higher Hertz pressures but can be prevented by more severe rates of micropitting wear as caused by higher roughness and lower Λ-ratio. Given the different implications of micropitting versus macropitting, the presented failure mode map can be used during the design process to help improve the reliability of relevant machines.

International Journal of FatigueVol. 197
Imperial College London (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Adhesion, Friction, and Surface Interactions
4.32
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.