Advancing the Risk Analysis for Alien Taxa (RAAT) framework

The Risk Analysis for Alien Taxa (RAAT) framework was developed to collate scientific information and interpret it in the context of South African regulations on biological invasions. Feedback from the past four years has shown RAAT to be a valuable tool for making evidence-based, transparent recommendations, but one that can be improved. We describe the changes made in creating RAAT v2.0. We note several issues that we suspect will apply to many similar processes, namely the need to i) clarify descriptions; ii) remove superfluous questions; and iii) add questions to fully justify recommendations. We also stress what RAAT v2.0 does not do—the framework does not summarise management best practices nor does it, or South Africa’s regulatory lists, provide sufficient information to prioritise management resources. We strongly recommend that explicit feedback mechanisms are set up to ensure that similar such frameworks can be improved over time.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
NeoBiota
Published
2025-03-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3897/neobiota.97.135975
Citations
4
Primary Topic
Climate Change Policy and Economics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
12.52

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Advancing the Risk Analysis for Alien Taxa (RAAT) framework

Sabrina Kumschick, Llewellyn C. Foxcroft, John R. Wilson
4 citations
NeoBiota
Climate Change Policy and Economics
12.52
article

Advancing the Risk Analysis for Alien Taxa (RAAT) framework

Sabrina Kumschick, Llewellyn C. Foxcroft, John R. Wilson
article en
4 citations

Abstract

The Risk Analysis for Alien Taxa (RAAT) framework was developed to collate scientific information and interpret it in the context of South African regulations on biological invasions. Feedback from the past four years has shown RAAT to be a valuable tool for making evidence-based, transparent recommendations, but one that can be improved. We describe the changes made in creating RAAT v2.0. We note several issues that we suspect will apply to many similar processes, namely the need to i) clarify descriptions; ii) remove superfluous questions; and iii) add questions to fully justify recommendations. We also stress what RAAT v2.0 does not do—the framework does not summarise management best practices nor does it, or South Africa’s regulatory lists, provide sufficient information to prioritise management resources. We strongly recommend that explicit feedback mechanisms are set up to ensure that similar such frameworks can be improved over time.

NeoBiotaVol. 97
South African National Parks (ZA), Stellenbosch University (ZA), South African National Biodiversity Institute (ZA), Scientific Services (ZA)
Universiteit Stellenbosch, Department of Forestry, Fisheries and the Environment
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
Climate Change Policy and Economics
12.52
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Advancing the Risk Analysis for Alien Taxa (RAAT) framework — Sabrina Kumschick, Llewellyn C. Foxcroft, et al. · NeoBiota (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS