Circling the void: Using Heidegger and Lacan to think about large language models

The essay aims to unite two currently distinct lines of thinking and working with language. Large Language Models and continental philosophy, especially Martin Heidegger’s thinking about language and, building upon Sigmund Freud, Jaques Lacan’s structural psychoanalysis. We show that the concept of language that Heidegger, Freud and Lacan discuss and utilize in clinical frameworks is matched quite strongly by modern LLMs. This allows us to discuss a problem of negation and negativity that is central to the continental discourse but missing in current LLM research. This also means that we offer a radically different approach than it is usual in the philosophy of artificial intelligence, since we base our concepts on thinkers that are often disregarded in the analytic philosophy discourse that is closer linked to AI research. To this end we also mark, where the ontological differences of the proposed approach lie. However, our aim is to address AI researcher and continental philosophers.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Cognitive Systems Research
Published
2025-03-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cogsys.2025.101349
Citations
5
Primary Topic
Language, Metaphor, and Cognition
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
10.59

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Circling the void: Using Heidegger and Lacan to think about large language models

Marc Heimann, Anne-Friederike Hübener
5 citations
Cognitive Systems Research
Language, Metaphor, and Cognition
10.59
article

Circling the void: Using Heidegger and Lacan to think about large language models

Marc Heimann, Anne-Friederike Hübener
article en
5 citations

Abstract

The essay aims to unite two currently distinct lines of thinking and working with language. Large Language Models and continental philosophy, especially Martin Heidegger’s thinking about language and, building upon Sigmund Freud, Jaques Lacan’s structural psychoanalysis. We show that the concept of language that Heidegger, Freud and Lacan discuss and utilize in clinical frameworks is matched quite strongly by modern LLMs. This allows us to discuss a problem of negation and negativity that is central to the continental discourse but missing in current LLM research. This also means that we offer a radically different approach than it is usual in the philosophy of artificial intelligence, since we base our concepts on thinkers that are often disregarded in the analytic philosophy discourse that is closer linked to AI research. To this end we also mark, where the ontological differences of the proposed approach lie. However, our aim is to address AI researcher and continental philosophers.

Cognitive Systems ResearchVol. 91
Hochschule Niederrhein (DE)
Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
Language, Metaphor, and Cognition
10.59
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Circling the void: Using Heidegger and Lacan to think about large language models — Marc Heimann, Anne-Friederike Hübener · Cognitive Systems Research (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS