Intellectual Self-reliance:J. P. S. Uberoi, Sociologyof Knowledge andModern Social Life

Of what value is freedom of expression, construction of identity, higher education and autonomy of university if these do not contribute to intellectual self-reliance? J. P. S. Uberoi has argued that intellectual self-reliance is respectful of the self and of the other as its second self. It acknowledges that all human beings are thinking social beings who aspire to know themselves, the world they live in and the relationship between the two. This is the basis of civility. However, historically, modernisation has not succeeded in creating conditions for the fulfilment of this aspiration. On the contrary, it has contributed to universalisation of othering at all levels of social, political and economic life. This has damaged reflexivity. He further argued that the questions of decolonisation cannot be fully addressed without the teleology of intellectual self-reliance. In this regard, it is necessary to question the monopoly of European science over naming, which defines things, classifies them in relation to each other and determines therelation of knowledge to way of life.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Sociological Bulletin
Published
2025-03-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/00380229251316460
Primary Topic
Critical Realism in Sociology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Intellectual Self-reliance:J. P. S. Uberoi, Sociologyof Knowledge andModern Social Life

Savyasaachi
Sociological Bulletin
Critical Realism in Sociology
article

Intellectual Self-reliance:J. P. S. Uberoi, Sociologyof Knowledge andModern Social Life

Savyasaachi
article en

Abstract

Of what value is freedom of expression, construction of identity, higher education and autonomy of university if these do not contribute to intellectual self-reliance? J. P. S. Uberoi has argued that intellectual self-reliance is respectful of the self and of the other as its second self. It acknowledges that all human beings are thinking social beings who aspire to know themselves, the world they live in and the relationship between the two. This is the basis of civility. However, historically, modernisation has not succeeded in creating conditions for the fulfilment of this aspiration. On the contrary, it has contributed to universalisation of othering at all levels of social, political and economic life. This has damaged reflexivity. He further argued that the questions of decolonisation cannot be fully addressed without the teleology of intellectual self-reliance. In this regard, it is necessary to question the monopoly of European science over naming, which defines things, classifies them in relation to each other and determines therelation of knowledge to way of life.

Sociological BulletinVol. 74(2)
Jamia Millia Islamia (IN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 95%
Critical Realism in Sociology
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.