Comparing a BCI communication system in a patient with Multiple System Atrophy, with an animal model

Paralysis affects many people worldwide, and the people affected often suffer from impaired communication. We developed a microelectrode-based Brain-Computer Interface (BCI) for enabling communication in patients affected by paralysis, and implanted it in a patient with Multiple System Atrophy (MSA), a neurodegenerative disease that causes widespread neural symptoms including paralysis. To verify the effectiveness of the BCI system, it was also tested by implanting it in a non-human primate (NHP). Data from the human and NHP were used to train binary classifiers two different types of machine learning models: a Linear Discriminant Analysis (LDA) model, and a Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM)-based Artificial Neural Network (ANN). The LDA model performed at up to 72.7 % accuracy for binary decoding in the human patient, however, performance was highly variable and was much lower on most recording days. The BCI system was able to accurately decode movement vs non-movement in the NHP (accuracy using LDA: 82.7 ± 3.3 %, LSTM: 83.7 ± 2.2 %, 95 % confidence intervals), however it was not able to with recordings from the human patient (accuracy using LDA: 47.0 ± 5.1 %, LSTM: 44.6 ± 9.9 %, 95 % confidence intervals). We discuss how neurodegenerative diseases such as MSA can impede BCI-based communication, and postulate on the mechanisms by which this may occur.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Brain Research Bulletin
Published
2025-03-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brainresbull.2025.111289
Primary Topic
EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparing a BCI communication system in a patient with Multiple System Atrophy, with an animal model

Valerie Toh, Kyaw Kyar Toe, Brian Premchand, Ming‐Yuan Cheng et al.
Brain Research Bulletin
EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces
article

Comparing a BCI communication system in a patient with Multiple System Atrophy, with an animal model

Valerie Toh, Kyaw Kyar Toe, Brian Premchand, Ming‐Yuan Cheng, Ruiqi Lim, Wai Hoe Ng, Thevapriya Selvaratnam, Camilo Libedinsky, Chuanchu Wang, Yuan Gao, Rosa Q. So, Kai Keng Ang, Weiguo Chen, Kai Rui Wan
article en

Abstract

Paralysis affects many people worldwide, and the people affected often suffer from impaired communication. We developed a microelectrode-based Brain-Computer Interface (BCI) for enabling communication in patients affected by paralysis, and implanted it in a patient with Multiple System Atrophy (MSA), a neurodegenerative disease that causes widespread neural symptoms including paralysis. To verify the effectiveness of the BCI system, it was also tested by implanting it in a non-human primate (NHP). Data from the human and NHP were used to train binary classifiers two different types of machine learning models: a Linear Discriminant Analysis (LDA) model, and a Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM)-based Artificial Neural Network (ANN). The LDA model performed at up to 72.7 % accuracy for binary decoding in the human patient, however, performance was highly variable and was much lower on most recording days. The BCI system was able to accurately decode movement vs non-movement in the NHP (accuracy using LDA: 82.7 ± 3.3 %, LSTM: 83.7 ± 2.2 %, 95 % confidence intervals), however it was not able to with recordings from the human patient (accuracy using LDA: 47.0 ± 5.1 %, LSTM: 44.6 ± 9.9 %, 95 % confidence intervals). We discuss how neurodegenerative diseases such as MSA can impede BCI-based communication, and postulate on the mechanisms by which this may occur.

Brain Research BulletinVol. 223
Agency for Science, Technology and Research (SG), Singapore Science Park (SG), Tan Tock Seng Hospital (SG), Institute for Infocomm Research (SG), National Neuroscience Institute (SG), Institute of Molecular and Cell Biology (SG)
Openalex Percentile: Top 96%
EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.