Numerical investigation with experimental validation of aerodynamics performance of NACA 2414 airfoil with passive momentum injection through channeling

• Split Airfoil Design: Multi-segment airfoils enhance the momentum of the upper flow direction and introduce secondary flow to mitigate separation. • Similar Effects as Slats and Flaps: The segmented airfoil effectively behaves like flaps and slats so it can be a logical alternative. • Validation of Results — Experiment and CFD results validation, results agreed fairly good, confirming the design with lift to drag ratio of 8.35 and 8.93 at Mach 0.1. Numerical Investigation Extensions: Mach 0.25 evaluates airfoil performance in a dynamic, realistic flow • Impact of Segment Gaps: This increases the lift-to-drag ratio from 48.12 to 51.37. The aerodynamics of a segmented airfoil was investigated through two-dimensional (2D)-based computational fluid dynamics (CFD) simulations. The airfoil was segmented without changing its fundamental shape, letting secondary flows from its lower surface energize the upper surface. This method was to increase momentum and thus help shed flow near the trailing edge. The results show that the segmented airfoil behaves much like flaps and slats, which complement the airfoil at low Reynolds numbers. This indicates that segmented designs could be a good alternative to traditional high-lift devices. The airfoil type used in the analysis was NACA 2414, which was either divided into a two- or three-segment configuration, with small gaps between each segment. Initially, a 100 mm chord airfoil was designed and experimentally scaled to 254 mm to gather effective information similar to that present in the field using non-dimensional parameters. The lift-to-drag ratio obtained was 8.35 at Mach 0.1 in experiment and 8.93 in numerical simulations, which validated the accuracy of computational model. Simulations were conducted at Mach 0.25 to evaluate performance under practical aerodynamic conditions. The flow was subsonic and incompressible. Different attack angles were investigated - cruise (≈5°) and near-stall (≈16°) conditions. Two-segment configurations produced results in good agreement with flow physics. Current study also investigated segment spacing effect where the maximum lift to drag ratio was found to be 51.37 instead of 48.12 for base airfoil with a 5 mm spacer between segments. It seems that the airfoil designs with segmented wings can make a difference in aerodynamic applications.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Results in Engineering
Published
2025-03-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rineng.2025.104533
Citations
6
Primary Topic
Plasma and Flow Control in Aerodynamics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
29.96
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Numerical investigation with experimental validation of aerodynamics performance of NACA 2414 airfoil with passive momentum injection through channeling

Abdullah Al-Faruk, Md. Mushfiqur Rahman, Ahmed Abrar Shayor, Md. Touhidur Rahman Evan
6 citations
Results in Engineering
Plasma and Flow Control in Aerodynamics
29.96
article

Numerical investigation with experimental validation of aerodynamics performance of NACA 2414 airfoil with passive momentum injection through channeling

Abdullah Al-Faruk, Md. Mushfiqur Rahman, Ahmed Abrar Shayor, Md. Touhidur Rahman Evan
article en
6 citations

Abstract

• Split Airfoil Design: Multi-segment airfoils enhance the momentum of the upper flow direction and introduce secondary flow to mitigate separation. • Similar Effects as Slats and Flaps: The segmented airfoil effectively behaves like flaps and slats so it can be a logical alternative. • Validation of Results — Experiment and CFD results validation, results agreed fairly good, confirming the design with lift to drag ratio of 8.35 and 8.93 at Mach 0.1. Numerical Investigation Extensions: Mach 0.25 evaluates airfoil performance in a dynamic, realistic flow • Impact of Segment Gaps: This increases the lift-to-drag ratio from 48.12 to 51.37. The aerodynamics of a segmented airfoil was investigated through two-dimensional (2D)-based computational fluid dynamics (CFD) simulations. The airfoil was segmented without changing its fundamental shape, letting secondary flows from its lower surface energize the upper surface. This method was to increase momentum and thus help shed flow near the trailing edge. The results show that the segmented airfoil behaves much like flaps and slats, which complement the airfoil at low Reynolds numbers. This indicates that segmented designs could be a good alternative to traditional high-lift devices. The airfoil type used in the analysis was NACA 2414, which was either divided into a two- or three-segment configuration, with small gaps between each segment. Initially, a 100 mm chord airfoil was designed and experimentally scaled to 254 mm to gather effective information similar to that present in the field using non-dimensional parameters. The lift-to-drag ratio obtained was 8.35 at Mach 0.1 in experiment and 8.93 in numerical simulations, which validated the accuracy of computational model. Simulations were conducted at Mach 0.25 to evaluate performance under practical aerodynamic conditions. The flow was subsonic and incompressible. Different attack angles were investigated - cruise (≈5°) and near-stall (≈16°) conditions. Two-segment configurations produced results in good agreement with flow physics. Current study also investigated segment spacing effect where the maximum lift to drag ratio was found to be 51.37 instead of 48.12 for base airfoil with a 5 mm spacer between segments. It seems that the airfoil designs with segmented wings can make a difference in aerodynamic applications.

Results in EngineeringVol. 25
Khulna University of Engineering and Technology (BD), Bangladesh University of Engineering and Technology (BD)
Affordable and clean energy
Openalex Percentile: Top 1%
Plasma and Flow Control in Aerodynamics
29.96
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.