Can an Abnormal Gastric Emptying Study Be Normal?

The American Neurogastroenterology and Motility Society and the Society of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging collaboratively wrote consensus statements to standardize gastric emptying scintigraphy. Despite this, centers are using nonstandard protocols. This study examined how these protocols contrast with standards. <b>Methods:</b> Consecutive charts were analyzed for meal, radionuclide dose, half-emptying time (T½) and its normal range, and documented retention and emptying. Impressions were compared with how emptying mapped on a graph based on standard 4-h values. <b>Results:</b> Thirty-four studies were identified. Ten of 14 abnormal studies were normal when plotted on the standard 4-h graph. Eight of 10 abnormal studies had normal 2- or 4-h retention. Normal T½ ranges varied significantly. Most altered the meal, and over 25% received a radionucleotide dose outside the recommended range. <b>Conclusion:</b> The upper bound of normal T½ falls within standard 4-h bounds, with many individuals given an erroneous impression. Though further optimization may be needed, adhering to standards is critical.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Technology
Published
2025-03-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.2967/jnmt.124.269182
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Gastrointestinal motility and disorders
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.81
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Can an Abnormal Gastric Emptying Study Be Normal?

Ben Freiberg
1 citations
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Technology
Gastrointestinal motility and disorders
1.81
article

Can an Abnormal Gastric Emptying Study Be Normal?

Ben Freiberg
article en
1 citations

Abstract

The American Neurogastroenterology and Motility Society and the Society of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging collaboratively wrote consensus statements to standardize gastric emptying scintigraphy. Despite this, centers are using nonstandard protocols. This study examined how these protocols contrast with standards. <b>Methods:</b> Consecutive charts were analyzed for meal, radionuclide dose, half-emptying time (T½) and its normal range, and documented retention and emptying. Impressions were compared with how emptying mapped on a graph based on standard 4-h values. <b>Results:</b> Thirty-four studies were identified. Ten of 14 abnormal studies were normal when plotted on the standard 4-h graph. Eight of 10 abnormal studies had normal 2- or 4-h retention. Normal T½ ranges varied significantly. Most altered the meal, and over 25% received a radionucleotide dose outside the recommended range. <b>Conclusion:</b> The upper bound of normal T½ falls within standard 4-h bounds, with many individuals given an erroneous impression. Though further optimization may be needed, adhering to standards is critical.

Journal of Nuclear Medicine TechnologyVol. 53(2)
Cleveland Clinic (US)
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 20%
Gastrointestinal motility and disorders
1.81
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Can an Abnormal Gastric Emptying Study Be Normal? — Ben Freiberg · Journal of Nuclear Medicine Technology (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS