Dismantling an Indigenous transport system: Roadbuilding and state formation in Colombian Amazonia

This article examines the simplification of an Indigenous transport system between the Putumayo and Caquetá Rivers, in Colombian Amazonia, into a single road tailored for the transportation needs of rubber barons, Capuchin missionaries, and Colombian government officials. It argues that the road was conceived to secure national sovereignty and facilitate the arrival of settlers and the commercialisation of forest products. However, state support for the project was limited to extraordinary events, such as the war against Peru in the 1930s that compromised Colombian sovereignty in the region. During peacetime, the budget and bureaucracy that made roadbuilding possible disappeared. Moreover, it contends that establishing a single road between the two rivers dismissed the Indigenous environmental and geographic knowledge about the territory, which became another reason for the road's failure. Research for this article relies on oral histories in Colombian Amazonia and archival research in Colombia, Italy, and Spain.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The Journal of Transport History
Published
2025-03-02
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/00225266251318715
Primary Topic
History and Politics in Latin America
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Dismantling an Indigenous transport system: Roadbuilding and state formation in Colombian Amazonia

Oscar Aponte
The Journal of Transport History
History and Politics in Latin America
article

Dismantling an Indigenous transport system: Roadbuilding and state formation in Colombian Amazonia

Oscar Aponte
article en

Abstract

This article examines the simplification of an Indigenous transport system between the Putumayo and Caquetá Rivers, in Colombian Amazonia, into a single road tailored for the transportation needs of rubber barons, Capuchin missionaries, and Colombian government officials. It argues that the road was conceived to secure national sovereignty and facilitate the arrival of settlers and the commercialisation of forest products. However, state support for the project was limited to extraordinary events, such as the war against Peru in the 1930s that compromised Colombian sovereignty in the region. During peacetime, the budget and bureaucracy that made roadbuilding possible disappeared. Moreover, it contends that establishing a single road between the two rivers dismissed the Indigenous environmental and geographic knowledge about the territory, which became another reason for the road's failure. Research for this article relies on oral histories in Colombian Amazonia and archival research in Colombia, Italy, and Spain.

The Journal of Transport HistoryVol. 46(1)
The Graduate Center, CUNY (US), City University of New York (US)
Social Science Research Council, Zeit-Stiftung Ebelin und Gerd Bucerius, Graduate Center
Openalex Percentile: Top 94%
History and Politics in Latin America
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.