Beyond punishment: Towards a framework of transformative accountability

The entrenched nature of punitive ideologies within societal structures demands a radical reconceptualization of justice and accountability. Sustained inquiry into modes of accountability that seek to exist outside the bounds of the broadly punitive thus presents a radical and necessary project. This article explores transformative justice (TJ) as a community-centered form of accountability that challenges punitive ideologies. Using ethnographic interviews with US-based TJ facilitators, I explore how these practices seek to address harm in a way that centers accountability, rather than punishment. I present a framework of eight spectrums that distinguish TJ processes from punishment. While punitive approaches seek to assign blame and isolate harmful actors from their communities, TJ relies on the core principle that all people are deserving of safety, dignity, and belonging, regardless of any harm they have caused. This article contributes to penal theory by arguing for a framework that views punishment and transformative consequences along a continuum, offering a critical perspective on the possibilities for justice beyond punitive mechanisms.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Punishment & Society
Published
2025-03-02
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/14624745251319345
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.20

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Beyond punishment: Towards a framework of transformative accountability

Camila Pelsinger
1 citations
Punishment & Society
Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis
4.20
article

Beyond punishment: Towards a framework of transformative accountability

Camila Pelsinger
article en
1 citations

Abstract

The entrenched nature of punitive ideologies within societal structures demands a radical reconceptualization of justice and accountability. Sustained inquiry into modes of accountability that seek to exist outside the bounds of the broadly punitive thus presents a radical and necessary project. This article explores transformative justice (TJ) as a community-centered form of accountability that challenges punitive ideologies. Using ethnographic interviews with US-based TJ facilitators, I explore how these practices seek to address harm in a way that centers accountability, rather than punishment. I present a framework of eight spectrums that distinguish TJ processes from punishment. While punitive approaches seek to assign blame and isolate harmful actors from their communities, TJ relies on the core principle that all people are deserving of safety, dignity, and belonging, regardless of any harm they have caused. This article contributes to penal theory by arguing for a framework that views punishment and transformative consequences along a continuum, offering a critical perspective on the possibilities for justice beyond punitive mechanisms.

Punishment & SocietyVol. 27(4)
University of Oxford (GB)
Rhodes Scholarships
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis
4.20
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.